Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30666550›Full record

SynthesisQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2019

ICECAP-O, the current state of play: a systematic review of studies reporting the psychometric properties and use of the instrument over the decade since its publication.

Louise Proud, Carol McLoughlin, Philip Kinghorn

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07136168 (Healthy Ageing - an Interdisciplinary Randomised Study of Health Dialogues in Primary Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07136168 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Healthy Ageing - an Interdisciplinary Randomised Study of Health Dialogues in Primary Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorLinkoeping UniversityRan2025 to 2031Enrolled2,952ConditionsFrailty, Ageing Well, Prevention Intervention, Health Related Quality of LifeArmsHealth dialogue
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A modelled cost-utility analysis comparing early referral to specialist palliative care versus standard care for older people with acute myeloid leukaemia.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The adult social care outcomes toolkit easy read for older people (ASCOT-ER OP): an exploratory factor analysis and Rasch validation study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Population normative data for OxCAP-MH capability scores.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Measuring what matters to older persons for active living: part I content development for the OPAL measure across four countries.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  16. Exploratory factor analysis and Rasch analysis to assess the structural validity of the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit Proxy version (ASCOT-Proxy) completed by care home staff.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Capability of Children with Hearing Devices: A Mixed Methods Study.Journal of deaf studies and deaf education · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Louise ProudHealth Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT, Edgbaston, UK.
Carol McLoughlinHealth Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT, Edgbaston, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6861-8259
Philip KinghornHealth Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT, Edgbaston, UK. p.kinghorn@bham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9333-1962

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA paper reporting the development of the ICECAP-O was published in 2006. Since then, there has been increasing interest in the use of capability-based measures within health economics and the ICECAP-O has been suggested for use in economic evaluation by decision-making bodies in the Netherlands and UK.

methodsA systematic review of studies published between January 2006 and October 2018 which have assessed the psychometric properties of ICECAP-O or utilised the measure within economic evaluation.

resultsTwenty-four studies explored the psychometric properties of ICECAP-O and 21 have utilised the measure within economic evaluation; one study reported psychometric properties as well as utilising the measure within economic evaluation. The ICECAP-O has good construct validity and responsiveness, but there is evidence of some issues relating to content validity. In the context of economic evaluation, the ICECAP-O has, to date, mainly been included as a secondary economic measure and the reporting of results is brief with minimal detail and often no discussion. Five of the economic evaluation studies combined scores from ICECAP-O with time, but each used different terminology to describe this result.

conclusionFocus, in terms of publications, appears to have shifted now from assessment of psychometric properties to the utilisation of the ICECAP-O within economic evaluation. Further research is needed with respect to a decision-rule for the ICECAP measures. This additional research should also guide users in terms of appropriate analysis, terminology and presentation of results, which are in-keeping with the conceptual framework underpinning the ICECAP-O.

Indexed as

AgedCross-Sectional StudiesHealthy AgingHumansNetherlandsPsychometricsQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited KingdomCapability approachEconomic evaluationICECAP-OResponsivenessSystematic reviewValidity

Identifiers

PMID30666550
PMCPMC6522451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.