Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30666547›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2019

Early esophageal adenocarcinoma detection using deep learning methods.

Noha Ghatwary, Massoud Zolgharni, Xujiong Ye

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
11.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The role of artificial intelligence in the endoscopic diagnosis of esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Artificial Intelligence in Endoscopy.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Noha GhatwaryUniversity of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK. nghatwary@lincoln.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4019-479X
Massoud ZolgharniUniversity of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0904-2904
Xujiong YeUniversity of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0115-0724
University of Lincoln · GBArab Academy for Science, Technology, and Maritime Transport · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aims to adapt and evaluate the performance of different state-of-the-art deep learning object detection methods to automatically identify esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) regions from high-definition white light endoscopy (HD-WLE) images.

methodSeveral state-of-the-art object detection methods using Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) were adapted to automatically detect abnormal regions in the esophagus HD-WLE images, utilizing VGG'16 as the backbone architecture for feature extraction. Those methods are Regional-based Convolutional Neural Network (R-CNN), Fast R-CNN, Faster R-CNN and Single-Shot Multibox Detector (SSD). For the evaluation of the different methods, 100 images from 39 patients that have been manually annotated by five experienced clinicians as ground truth have been tested.

resultsExperimental results illustrate that the SSD and Faster R-CNN networks show promising results, and the SSD outperforms other methods achieving a sensitivity of 0.96, specificity of 0.92 and F-measure of 0.94. Additionally, the Average Recall Rate of the Faster R-CNN in locating the EAC region accurately is 0.83.

conclusionIn this paper, recent deep learning object detection methods are adapted to detect esophageal abnormalities automatically. The evaluation of the methods proved its ability to locate abnormal regions in the esophagus from endoscopic images. The automatic detection is a crucial step that may help early detection and treatment of EAC and also can improve automatic tumor segmentation to monitor its growth and treatment outcome.

Indexed as

Deep LearningEarly DiagnosisNeural Networks, ComputerAdenocarcinomaEsophageal NeoplasmsHumansReproducibility of ResultsBarrett’s esophagusDeep learningEsophageal adenocarcinoma detectionHD-WLE

Identifiers

PMID30666547
PMCPMC6420905
OpenAlexW2911774387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.