Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30666481›Full record

SynthesisEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2019

Is cell transplantation a reliable therapeutic strategy for spinal cord injury in clinical practice? A systematic review and meta-analysis from 22 clinical controlled trials.

He Zhao, Qing-Ling Sun, Li-Jun Duan, Yong-Dong Yang, Yu-Shan Gao, Ding-Yan Zhao, Yang Xiong, He-Jun Wang, Jia-Wei Song, Kai-Tan Yang and 2 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. [Advances in stem cell transplantation for traumatic spinal cord injury at different stages].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2023
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

He ZhaoSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
Qing-Ling SunDepartment of Geriatric, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100700, China.
Li-Jun DuanDepartment of Orthopedics III, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100700, China.
Yong-Dong YangDepartment of Orthopedics III, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100700, China.
Yu-Shan GaoDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029, China.
Ding-Yan ZhaoDepartment of Orthopedics III, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100700, China.
Yang XiongDepartment of Orthopedics III, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100700, China.
He-Jun WangDepartment of Orthopedics III, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100700, China.
Jia-Wei SongDepartment of Orthopedics III, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100700, China.
Kai-Tan YangDepartment of Orthopedics III, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100700, China.
Xiu-Mei WangSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China. xiumeitsinghua@sina.com.
Xing YuDepartment of Orthopedics III, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100700, China. yuxingbucm@sina.com.
Dongzhimen Hospital Affiliated to Beijing University of Chinese Medicine · CNTsinghua University · CNBeijing University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIt is an open question whether cell transplantation can provide safety and effective outcome to spinal cord injury (SCI) patient which has remained controversial for almost 40 years. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of cell transplantation in SCI patients.

methodStudies of the cell transplantation for SCI were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Medline, Cochrane Library and analyzed quantitative data by Review Manager 5.3.

resultsTwenty-one clinical controlled studies with 973 patients were included. The pooled results suggested that cell transplantation significantly improved ASIA score, ASIA motor score, ASIA sensory score, Barthel Index score, residual urine volume, rehabilitative time of automatic micturition. Furthermore, subgroup analysis indicated that the stem cells exhibited more potent than the non-stem cells in spinal cord repair. Cell transplantation at more than 14 days after injury showed more significant improvements than that within 14 days from injury. The dosage of cell transplantation between 1-5 × 10

conclusionCell transplantation appears to be a safe therapeutic strategy possessing substantial beneficial effects in the patients with SCI in clinic. Moreover, treating SCI with stem cell, the dosage of cells between 1-5 × 10

Indexed as

Cell TransplantationHumansPostoperative ComplicationsSpinal Cord InjuriesCell transplantationSpinal cord injurySystematic review and meta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID30666481
OpenAlexW2910944526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.