Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30666467›Full record

ArticleEmergency radiology2019

Role of MDCT as an effective imaging tool in detection of complications amongst oncological patients in a tertiary care oncology institute.

Anuradha Rao, Raghuram Parampalli

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Emergency radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 98% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anuradha RaoDepartment of Radiology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, 317, 11th Across, 20th Main, 2nd Phase, J.P. Nagar, Bangalore, Karnataka, India. anu78rao@gmail.com.
Raghuram ParampalliDepartment of Radiology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe objectives of the study are to evaluate the role of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), its sensitivity and specificity in recognizing the complications related to oncology, and its treatment in patients with known malignancies and to determine how clinician's diagnosis, diagnostic dilemma, and management decisions are affected by the results of computed tomography (CT) in a tertiary care oncology setup. MATERIALS AND

methodsA thorough retrospective search of the database of 1 year in the Department of Radiology was done at our tertiary oncology center, of patients who were diagnosed or suspected with complications associated with cancer. In addition, patients, in whom acute emergencies were detected by the MDCT, were also included as these were mostly part of the complications related to the malignancies. A total of 207 patients were included after excluding patients in whom the final diagnosis was uncertain or in patients who died before a definitive diagnosis was made. Clinical details were noted and compared with the CT diagnosis of the complication.

resultsOut of the 207 patients, majority of complications were related to cardiovascular system [22.2%]. Gastrointestinal malignancies constituted the next most common [20.7%], followed by genitourinary [17.8%], central nervous system [9.6%], and respiratory system complications [8.2%]. The musculoskeletal and head and neck complications were seen in 4.8% of the total patients. The iatrogenic complications and those complications arising due to chemotherapy or radiotherapy were separated constituting about 5.3% of the total number of patients in the study. CT showed a sensitivity of 96.4%, specificity of 66.6%, positive predictive value of 98.4%, and negative predictive value of 46.1% in detecting these complications. Overall, CT detected 96.6% of complications which were not suspected clinically and detected 83% of complications supporting the clinical suspicion.

conclusionMDCT plays an important role in detecting the complications associated with malignancies. It helps in definitive diagnosis of those complications which are clinically suspected and also in recognizing those complications which may not be apparent clinically and thus can change the management strategies. This is probably the first comprehensive study in the English literature evaluating and highlighting the role of MDCT in recognizing various complications in patients with known malignancies.

Indexed as

FemaleHumansIatrogenic DiseaseMaleMultidetector Computed TomographyNeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityTertiary Health CareCancerEmergenciesMalignanciesMDCTOncological complications

Identifiers

PMID30666467
OpenAlexW2914247591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.