Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30666466›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient-reported outcomes2019

Adapting the Interpersonal Quality in Family Planning care scale to assess patient perspectives on abortion care.

Kyla Z Donnelly, Christine Dehlendorf, Reiley Reed, Daniela Agusti, Rachel Thompson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kyla Z DonnellyThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, 1 Medical Drive, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA. kyla.z.donnelly@dartmouth.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2527-808X
Christine DehlendorfUCSF Department of Family and Community Medicine, 1001 Potrero Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94110, USA.
Reiley ReedUCSF Department of Family and Community Medicine, 1001 Potrero Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94110, USA.
Daniela AgustiThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, 1 Medical Drive, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.
Rachel ThompsonSydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, 2006, NSW, Australia.
Dartmouth College · USThe University of Sydney · AUUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Society of Family Planning Research Fund SFPRF10-T8
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen value receiving quality interpersonal care during abortion services, yet no measure exists to assess this outcome from patients' perspectives. We sought to adapt the Interpersonal Quality in Family Planning care scale (Dehlendorf et al., American Journal of Obstetrics Gynaecology 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.01.173, 2016) for use in abortion care.

methodsWe adapted items from the original scale for the abortion context, and conducted cognitive interviews to explore the acceptability, understandability, and importance of the adapted items. Adults who spoke English and/or Spanish, had an abortion in the past year, and lived in the US were eligible to participate. Interview memos were analyzed concurrently with data collection to refine the measure in stages.

resultsWe interviewed 26 participants. Items were tested over seven stages and led to four main changes. First, we revised three items to reflect concepts perceived as important to the specific decision-making context of abortion. Second, we removed two items that emerged as potentially inappropriate for this context. Third, we modified language in four items to improve their appropriateness for this context (e.g., 'telling me' to 'explaining'; 'letting me say' to 'listening to'). Fourth, we modified language in three items to improve their clarity. Three items remained unchanged, as there was consistent agreement on their importance, understandability, and relevance.

conclusionsThe resulting 10-item measure, the Interpersonal Quality in Abortion Care scale, was perceived to be highly important, understandable, and feasible to complete. Future psychometric evaluation can prepare it for use in clinical practice to ensure women feel adequately informed and supported during abortion care.

Indexed as

AbortionInterpersonal careMeasurementPatient-provider communicationScale development

Identifiers

PMID30666466
PMCPMC6340910
OpenAlexW2933056845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.