Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30666366›Full record

Trial reportIntensive care medicine2019

Influence of the initial level of consciousness on early, goal-directed mobilization: a post hoc analysis.

Stefan J Schaller, Flora T Scheffenbichler, Somnath Bose, Nicole Mazwi, Hao Deng, Franziska Krebs, Christian L Seifert, George Kasotakis, Stephanie D Grabitz, Nicola Latronico and 3 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Intensive care medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. [Early mobilisation on the intensive care unit : What we know].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Stefan J SchallerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Flora T ScheffenbichlerDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Somnath BoseDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Nicole MazwiDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Hao DengDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Franziska KrebsDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Christian L SeifertDepartment of Neurology, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
George KasotakisDepartment of Surgery, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Stephanie D GrabitzDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Nicola LatronicoDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Emergency Medicine, Spedali Civili University Hospital, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Timothy HouleDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Manfred BlobnerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Matthias EikermannDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. meikerma@bidmc.harvard.edu.
Harvard University · USKlinikum rechts der Isar · DETechnical University of Munich · DEBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USBoston University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USUniversity of Brescia · ITUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DE

Funding

Jeff and Judy Buzen 222302
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEarly mobilization within 72 h of intensive care unit (ICU) admission improves functional status at hospital discharge. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of early, goal-directed mobilization in critically ill patients across a broad spectrum of initial consciousness levels.

methodsPost hoc analysis of the international, randomized, controlled, outcome-assessor blinded SOMS trial conducted 2011-2015. Randomization was stratified according to the immediate post-injury Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) (≤ 8 or > 8). Patients received either SOMS-guided mobility treatment with a facilitator or standard care. We used general linear models to test the hypothesis that immediate post-randomization GCS modulates the intervention effects on functional independence at hospital discharge.

resultsTwo hundred patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. The significant effect of early, goal-directed mobilization was consistent across levels of GCS without evidence of effect modification, for the primary outcome functional independence at hospital discharge (p = 0.53 for interaction), as well as average achieved mobility level during ICU stay (mean achieved SOMS level) and functional status at hospital discharge measured with the functional independence measure. In patients with low GCS, delay to first mobilization therapy was longer (0.7 ± 0.2 days vs. 0.2 ± 0.1 days, p = 0.008), but early, goal-directed mobilization compared with standard care significantly increased functional independence at hospital discharge in this subgroup of patients with immediate post-randomization GCS ≤ 8 (OR 3.67; 95% CI 1.02-13.14; p = 0.046).

conclusionThis post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial suggests that early, goal-directed mobilization in patients with an impaired initial conscious state (GCS ≤ 8) is not harmful but effective.

Indexed as

Treatment OutcomeAgedAustriaBrain InjuriesConsciousness DisordersCritical CareEarly AmbulationFemaleGermanyGlasgow Coma ScaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsLength of StayLogistic ModelsMaleMassachusettsConsciousnessCritical careDeliriumEarly mobilizationEarly rehabilitationFunctional statusNeurocritical care

Identifiers

PMID30666366
OpenAlexW2911787232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.