ArticleCurrent hepatology reports2018
Long-Term Outcomes After Drug-Induced Liver Injury.
Article in Current hepatology reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Drug-Induced Autoimmune Hepatitis by Varenicline and Infliximab as a Continuous Disease Spectrum with Two Different Flares: Acute Liver Injury Followed by Hepatic Autoimmunity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Drug-induced liver injury: Diagnosis, management and the role of liver transplantation.Hepatology forum · 2025Review
- Mechanism of drug-induced liver injury and hepatoprotective effects of natural drugs.Chinese medicine · 2021Review
- Drug properties and host factors contribute to biochemical presentation of drug-induced liver injury: a prediction model from a machine learning approach.Archives of toxicology · 2021Article
- The Immunological Mechanisms and Immune-Based Biomarkers of Drug-Induced Liver Injury.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Review
- Worldwide Use of RUCAM for Causality Assessment in 81,856 Idiosyncratic DILI and 14,029 HILI Cases Published 1993-Mid 2020: A Comprehensive Analysis.Medicines (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Drug-induced liver injury.Yeungnam University journal of medicine · 2020Article
- Idiosyncratic DILI: Analysis of 46,266 Cases Assessed for Causality by RUCAM and Published From 2014 to Early 2019.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of the reviewThis review serves to update the reader on emerging data regarding a spectrum of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) outcomes that lie between complete resolution and acute liver failure. Such outcomes can range from mild chronic injury to late liver failure and mortality. RECENT
findingsSeveral large registries are maturing with large numbers of DILI cases thus shedding light on outcomes including chronic injury and late fatality. We cover definitions commonly used to describe resolution versus chronic injury and mortality due to DILI. We look at rates of occurrence for these different outcomes in major registries. Three specific types of chronic DILI that are illustrative but also easily missed by clinicians are also described. SUMMARY: A small but important proportion of DILI cases do not resolve, going on to develop chronic injury and even liver failure. Defining and recognizing these cases is a challenge because DILI is rare, and chronic injury rarer still. Large registries are beginning to define these previously overlooked long term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.