Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30666204›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2018

Standard-Dose Proton Pump Inhibitors in the Initial Non-eradication Treatment of Duodenal Ulcer: Systematic Review, Network Meta-Analysis, and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Jiaxing Zhang, Long Ge, Matt Hill, Yi Liang, Juan Xie, Dejun Cui, Xiaosi Li, Wenyi Zheng, Rui He

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guidelines on optimizing the use of proton pump inhibitors: PPI stewardship.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2023
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Frontiers in medicine · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Jiaxing ZhangDepartment of Pharmacy, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang, China.
Long GeFirst Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Matt HillHealth Outcomes and Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States.
Yi LiangHealth Outcomes and Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States.
Juan XieDepartment of Pharmacy, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang, China.
Dejun CuiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang, China.
Xiaosi LiDepartment of Pharmacy, Hospital of Chengdu Office of People's Government of Tibetan Autonomous Region, Chengdu, China.
Wenyi ZhengExperimental Cancer Medicine, Clinical Research Center, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Rui HeExperimental Cancer Medicine, Clinical Research Center, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital · CNKarolinska Institutet · SEAustin College · USLanzhou University · CNThe University of Texas at Austin · USTibet Autonomous Region People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

cost-effectiveness analysisduodenal ulcernetwork meta-analysisproton pump inhibitorssystematic review

Identifiers

PMID30666204
PMCPMC6330312
OpenAlexW2908540304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.