Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30666175›Full record

ArticlePragmatic and observational research2019

Low-fluoroscopy atrial fibrillation ablation with contact force and ultrasound technologies: a learning curve.

Paul C Zei, Tina D Hunter, Larry M Gache, Gerri O'Riordan, Tina Baykaner, Chad R Brodt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pragmatic and observational research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Practical guidance to reduce radiation exposure in electrophysiology applying ultra low-dose protocols: a European Heart Rhythm Association review.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Review
  4. Steerable sheath visualizable under 3D electroanatomical mapping facilitates paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation with minimal fluoroscopy.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2023
    Article
  5. Intracardiac echocardiography Chinese expert consensus.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022
    Review
  6. Operator learning curve and clinical outcomes of zero fluoroscopy catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation, supraventricular tachycardia, and ventricular arrhythmias.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Paul C ZeiCardiac Electrophysiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Tina D HunterReal World Evidence, CTI Clinical Trial and Consulting Services, Covington, KY, USA, thunter@ctifacts.com.
Larry M GacheReal World Evidence, CTI Clinical Trial and Consulting Services, Covington, KY, USA, thunter@ctifacts.com.
Gerri O'RiordanCardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Tina BaykanerCardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Chad R BrodtCardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFluoroscopy exposure during catheter ablation is a health hazard to patients and operators. This study presents the results of implementing a low-fluoroscopy workflow using modern contact force (CF) technologies in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) ablation.

methodsA fluoroscopy reduction workflow was implemented and subsequent catheter ablations for PAF were evaluated. After vascular access with ultrasound guidance, a THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH

resultsForty-three patients underwent PAF ablation with fluoroscopy reduction workflow (mean age: 66±9 years; 70% male), performed by five operators. Acute success rate (PV isolation) was 96.5% of PVs. One case of pericardial effusion, not requiring intervention, was the only acute complication. Mean procedure time was 217±42 minutes. Mean fluoroscopy time was 2.3±3.0 minutes, with 97.7% of patients having < 10 minutes and 86.0% having < 5 minutes. A significant downward trend over time was observed, suggesting a rapid learning curve for fluoroscopy reduction. Freedom from any atrial arrhythmias without reablation was 80.0% after a mean follow-up of 12±3 months.

conclusionLow fluoroscopy time is achievable with CF technologies after a short learning curve, without compromising patient safety or effectiveness.

Indexed as

atrial fibrillationcatheter ablationcontact forcelow fluoroscopyworkflow

Identifiers

PMID30666175
PMCPMC6330962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.