ReviewClinical psychology review2019
Foundations of idiographic methods in psychology and applications for psychotherapy.
Review in Clinical psychology review, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
58 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The role of affect in chronic pain: A systematic review of within-person symptom dynamics.Journal of psychosomatic research · 2021Pooled it
- The daily association between affect and alcohol use: A meta-analysis of individual participant data.Psychological bulletinPooled it
- Rapid Innovation of Precision Psychiatry Interventions Using Dynamical Systems Modeling and Ecological Quasi-Experiments: Protocol for a Proof-of-Concept Study on Eating Disorders.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Re-Envisioning Clinical Science Training: Open Science as One of Many Important Steps.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2026Article
- Predicting Momentary Suicidal Ideation From Smartphone Screenshots Using Vision-Language Models: Prospective Machine Learning Study.JMIR mental health · 2026Article
- Positive psychology 4.0: a science of consequence for a world that can no longer wait.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Relearning the epistemology, history, and future of neuropsychiatry.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Review
- Idiographic momentary profiles of personality facets.Journal of personality and social psychology · 2026Article
- Robustness, Generalizability, and Heterogeneity of Dynamic Networks of Psychopathology.Cognitive therapy and research · 2026Article
- Within-person associations of daily activity to sleep actigraphy following trauma: Explicating a novel index of risk for major depressive disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder.Journal of psychopathology and clinical science · 2025Article
- A Phenomenological Study Exploring the Perceptions of Parents and Children Participating in the Lidcombe Program for Early Stuttering in Turkiye.Folia phoniatrica et logopaedica : official organ of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (IALP) · 2025Article
- Ecological Momentary Assessment as a Measure of Intervention Change: Evaluation in 4 Digital Mental Health Trials.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Using network analysis to personalize treatment for individuals with co-occurring restrictive eating disorders and suicidality: a proof-of-concept study.Journal of eating disorders · 2025Article
- Idiographic Lapse Prediction With State Space Modeling: Algorithm Development and Validation Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Observational
- Revisiting the Affect Regulation Model of Suicide Ideation: Bidirectional Effects of Momentary Suicide Ideation and Affect.Suicide & life-threatening behavior · 2025Article
- Links between self-monitoring data collected through smartphones and smartwatches and the individual disease trajectories of adult patients with depressive disorders: Study protocol of a one-year observational trial.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2025Article
- Unsupervised Model Construction in Continuous-Time.Structural equation modeling : a multidisciplinary journal · 2025Article
- The Use of Feedback in Mental Health Services: Expanding Horizons on Reach and Implementation.Administration and policy in mental health · 2025Article
- Pathways, predictors and paradoxes of illbeing and wellbeing in older adults: Insights from a UK Biobank study.PLOS mental health · 2025Article
- Predictors of substance use during treatment for addiction: A network analysis of ecological momentary assessment data.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Researchers have long called for greater recognition and use of longitudinal, individual-level research in the study of psychopathology and psychotherapy. Much of our current research attempts to indirectly investigate individual-level, or idiographic, psychological processes via group-based, or nomothetic, designs. However, results from nomothetic research do not necessarily translate to the individual-level. In this review, we discuss how idiographic analyses can be integrated into psychotherapy and psychotherapy research. We examine and review key statistical methods for conducting idiographic analyses. These methods include factor-based and vector autoregressive approaches using longitudinal data. The theoretical framework behind each approach is reviewed and critically evaluated. Empirical examples of each approach are discussed, with the aim of helping interested readers consider how they may use idiographic methods to analyze longitudinal data and psychological processes. Finally, we conclude by citing key limitations of the idiographic approach, calling for greater development of these analyses to ease their successful integration into clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.