Observational studyAtencion primaria2020
[Nutritional status and associated factors in ambulatory elderly patients].
Observational study in Atencion primaria, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence of malnutrition in a non-institutionalized elderly population of Benilloba, Alicante.Farmaceuticos comunitarios · 2026Article
- Nutritional Status of Very Elderly Outpatients with Heart Failure and Its Influence on Prognosis.Nutrients · 2024Observational
- Factors Influencing Nutritional Status in Hospitalized Individuals Aged 70 and Above.Nutrients · 2024Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo analyze the nutritional status (NS) of patients older than 65 years and establish their relationship with sociodemographic and health variables.
designCross-sectional observational study in patients older than 65 years. LOCATION: 3 health centers.
participants255 patients: ambulatory (AP), in domiciliary care (DP) or institutionalized (IP). They completed the study 243 (response rate 95.3%). MAIN MEASUREMENTS: The Chang method was applied to determine the NS. Sociodemographic, anthropometric variables, dependence, mood, cognitive and analytical parameters were collected. Associations were analyzed applying chi-square and analysis of variance. The prevalence ratio (PR) for malnutrition was calculated. A multivariate model was applied (binary logistic regression). Significance was considered for p<0.05.
resultsThe average age was 81.3 years (SD=7.4) and 72.0% were women. 48.9% were AP, 26.8% DP and 24.2% IP. 29.6% (95% CI: 23.9-35.8) presented malnutrition. Greater malnutrition was established in relation to living in a residence or requiring home help (PR=5.3), age over 85 (PR=4.9), presenting a moderate or higher dependency for basic activities of daily living (PR=3.9) and instrumental (PR=3.3), need help for mobility (PR=2.9) and present moderate/severe cognitive impairment (PR=2.1). The determinants of malnutrition in the multivariate model were older than 85 years old and being IP or DP.
conclusionsEmphasis should be placed on evaluating NS in patients older than 85 years of age who live in a residence or require home care, since they are the groups at greatest risk of malnutrition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.