Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30665446›Full record

ReviewOrphanet journal of rare diseases2019

Recommendations for patient screening in ultra-rare inherited metabolic diseases: what have we learned from Niemann-Pick disease type C?

María-Jesús Sobrido, Peter Bauer, Tom de Koning, Thomas Klopstock, Yann Nadjar, Marc C Patterson, Matthis Synofzik, Chris J Hendriksz

Open access · goldAbstract readConsensus StatementReview
In one paragraph

Review in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. [Inherited metabolic liver disease causing copper deposition].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Hereditary Hypofibrinogenemia with Hepatic Storage.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Novel compound heterozygous mutation inJournal of genetics · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.

María-Jesús SobridoNeurogenetics Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria, Santiago de Compostela, Spain. ssobrido@gmail.com.
Peter BauerInsititute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, Tübingen University, Tübingen, Germany.
Tom de KoningUniversity of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Thomas KlopstockDepartment of Neurology, Friedrich-Baur-Institute, University Hospital of the Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany, and Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany.
Yann NadjarDepartment of Neurology, Reference Centre for Lysosomal Diseases (CRML), UF Neurogenetics and Metabolism, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France.
Marc C PattersonMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Matthis SynofzikDepartment of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Chris J HendrikszUniversity of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Centogene (Germany) · DEGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases · DEHertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research · DEInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago · ESMayo Clinic · USSorbonne Université · FRUniversity of Pretoria · ZAUniversity of Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRare and ultra-rare diseases (URDs) are often chronic and life-threatening conditions that have a profound impact on sufferers and their families, but many are notoriously difficult to detect. Niemann-Pick disease type C (NP-C) serves to illustrate the challenges, benefits and pitfalls associated with screening for ultra-rare inborn errors of metabolism (IEMs). A comprehensive, non-systematic review of published information from NP-C screening studies was conducted, focusing on diagnostic methods and study designs that have been employed to date. As a key part of this analysis, data from both successful studies (where cases were positively identified) and unsuccessful studies (where the chosen approach failed to identify any cases) were included alongside information from our own experiences gained from the planning and execution of screening for NP-C. On this basis, best-practice recommendations for ultra-rare IEM screening are provided. Twenty-six published screening studies were identified and categorised according to study design into four groups: 1) prospective patient cohort and family-based secondary screenings (18 studies); 2) analyses of archived 'biobank' materials (one study); 3) medical chart review and bioinformatics data mining (five studies); and 4) newborn screening (two studies). NPC1/NPC2 sequencing was the most common primary screening method (Sanger sequencing in eight studies and next-generation sequencing [gene panel or exome sequencing] in five studies), followed by biomarker analyses (usually oxysterols) and clinical surveillance.

conclusionsHistorically, screening for NP-C has been based on single-patient studies, small case series, and targeted cohorts, but the emergence of new diagnostic methods over the last 5-10 years has provided opportunities to screen for NP-C on a larger scale. Combining clinical, biomarker and genetic diagnostic methods represents the most effective way to identify NP-C cases, while reducing the likelihood of misdiagnosis. Our recommendations are intended as a guide for planning screening protocols for ultra-rare IEMs in general.

Indexed as

Niemann-Pick Disease, Type CRare DiseasesData MiningHumansProspective StudiesDiagnosisNiemann-Pick diseaseScreeningUltra-rare disease

Identifiers

PMID30665446
PMCPMC6341610
OpenAlexW2913019854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.