Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30665438›Full record

ArticleTrials2019

Integral movement therapy versus local movement therapy approach in patients with idiopathic chronic low-back pain: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Suzana Pustivšek, Nejc Šarabon

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03623802 (Integral Movement Therapy Versus Local Movement Therapy Approach in Patients With Idiopathic Chronic Low Back Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03623802 naunknown statusnot on this map

Integral Movement Therapy Versus Local Movement Therapy Approach in Patients With Idiopathic Chronic Low Back Pain: a Randomized Controlled Trail.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PrimorskaRan2018 to 2019Enrolled80ConditionsLow Back PainArmsLocal Movement Therapy, Integral Movement Therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Suzana PustivšekZdravstveni dom Kranj, Gosposvetska 9, 4000, Kranj, Slovenia.
Nejc ŠarabonUP Fakulteta za vede o zdravju, Polje 42, 6310, Izola, Slovenia. nejc.sarabon@fvz.upr.si.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0747-3735
Kranj School Centre · SIZdravstveni centar · RS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic low-back pain (CLBP) is one of the most common reasons for seeking medical care and it imposes a significant burden on individuals and society at large. Systematic reviews evaluating the effectiveness of supervised exercise therapies commonly conclude that, to date, there is no evidence to support the superiority of one form of exercise over another. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) to date included mostly trunk strengthening exercises (e.g. bird dog, plank) and there is no evidence about supervised, individually graded integral movement therapy program for patients with CLBP.

methodsThe research design is a RCT with parallel-group design including two intervention groups: integral movement therapy and conventional local movement therapy. Participants in each group will receive 20 supervised sessions in a 10-week period, twice per week, for approximately 1 h per session. Outcome assessments will occur at baseline and immediately after intervention, follow-up will take place at six months and 12 months after the intervention. Prespecified analyses will evaluate the main effects of the treatment. DISCUSSION: This trial will use a novel, previously unexplored integral approach to CLBP through exercises. In contrast to commonly used exercise programs, the integral program does not include specific local strength exercises for hip and trunk flexors and extensors. However, learning dynamic trunk muscle control in various body positions with added limb movements could be beneficial because of the parallels to everyday work. The study will contribute to clinical practice by providing evidence to guide professionals when deciding for the proper and efficient treatment of patients with CLBP.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03623802 . Registered on 9th August 2018.

Indexed as

Exercise Movement TechniquesAdultChronic PainData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansLow Back PainMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignSample SizeChronic low-back painIntegral movement therapyLocal movement therapySupervised training

Identifiers

PMID30665438
PMCPMC6340171
OpenAlexW2921392307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.