Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30665430›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2019

Geographic variation in the treatment of proximal humerus fracture: an update on surgery rates and treatment consensus.

Sarah B Floyd, Joel Campbell, Cole G Chapman, Charles A Thigpen, Michael J Kissenberth, John M Brooks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The fragility and reverse fragility indices of proximal humerus fracture randomized controlled trials: a systematic review.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Proximal humerus fractures: Treatment controversies.OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Position statement: management of proximal humerus fractures.Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sarah B FloydCenter for Effectiveness Research in Orthopaedics, P.O. Box 25571, Greenville, SC, 29616, USA. Floydsb@mailbox.sc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7412-8136
Joel CampbellSteadman Hawkins Clinic of the Carolinas, Greenville Health System, 200 Patewood Dr. Suite C100, Greenville, SC, 29615, USA.
Cole G ChapmanCenter for Effectiveness Research in Orthopaedics, P.O. Box 25571, Greenville, SC, 29616, USA.
Charles A ThigpenCenter for Effectiveness Research in Orthopaedics, P.O. Box 25571, Greenville, SC, 29616, USA.
Michael J KissenberthSteadman Hawkins Clinic of the Carolinas, Greenville Health System, 200 Patewood Dr. Suite C100, Greenville, SC, 29615, USA.
John M BrooksCenter for Effectiveness Research in Orthopaedics, P.O. Box 25571, Greenville, SC, 29616, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUsing a larger, more comprehensive sample, and inclusion of the reverse shoulder arthroplasty as a primary surgical approach for proximal humerus fracture, we report on geographic variation in the treatment of proximal humerus fracture in 2011 and comment on whether treatment consensus is being reached.

methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of Medicare patients with an x-ray-confirmed diagnosis of proximal humerus fracture in 2011. Patients receiving reverse shoulder arthroplasty, hemiarthroplasty, or open reduction internal fixation within 60 days of their diagnosis were classified as surgical management patients. Unadjusted observed surgery rates and area treatment ratios adjusted for patient demographic and clinical characteristics were calculated at the hospital referral region level.

resultsAmong patients with proximal humerus fracture (N = 77,053), 15.4% received surgery and 84.6% received conservative management. Unadjusted surgery rates varied from 1.7 to 33.3% across hospital referral regions. Among patients receiving surgery, 22.3% received hemiarthroplasty, 65.8% received open reduction internal fixation, and 11.8% received reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Patients that were female, were younger, had fewer medical comorbidities, had a lower frailty index, were white, or were not dual-eligible for Medicaid during the month of their index fracture were more likely to receive surgery (p < .0001). Geographic variation in the treatment of proximal humerus fracture persisted after adjustment for patient demographic and clinical differences across local areas. Average surgery rates ranged from 9.9 to 21.2% across area treatment ratio quintiles.

conclusionsPersistent geographic variation in surgery rates for proximal humerus fracture across the USA suggests no treatment consensus has been reached.

Indexed as

MedicareOrthopedic ProceduresShoulder FracturesAgedAged, 80 and overArthroplasty, ReplacementCohort StudiesConsensusConsensus Statements as TopicFemaleFracture Fixation, InternalHumansMaleOpen Fracture ReductionRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeMedicareOrthopedic proceduresOrthopedicsShoulderShoulder fracturesSurgery

Identifiers

PMID30665430
PMCPMC6341604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.