ArticleBMC health services research2019
Healthcare professionals' perspectives on working conditions, leadership, and safety climate: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 59 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
59 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSPSC): a systematic review of the psychometric properties of 62 international studies.BMJ open · 2019Pooled it
- Shaping a positive occupational safety climate in general practice teams-findings of the baseline survey of the cluster randomized IMPROVEFrontiers in public health · 2025Trial
- Correlates of working conditions and affect balance among healthcare workers in Upper Egypt.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Leveraging sociological systems theory: integrating transformational leadership and social capital to enhance quality of care - an exploratory longitudinal study of German hospitals.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Protecting healthcare workers? Effects of a multilevel intervention targeting emotional demands.Health economics review · 2026Article
- Professionals' Perceptions of the Management of Digital Competence Sharing in Healthcare and Associated Background Factors: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Observational
- Enhancing healthcare workers' safety and well-being through a comprehensive qualitative analysis across hospital settings.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Health status, health behavior and perceived stress of nursing staff in Germany: a scoping review.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Article
- Doctor performance drivers: insights from various theoretical perspectives.Frontiers in sociology · 2026Article
- Exploring the link between physician burnout and intentions to retire early.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Investigating Factors Associated with Employees' Attitudes Towards Work-Related Infection Control Measures During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Study from Seven Different Companies in Germany, July-August 2021.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Psychosocial working conditions and violence prevention climate in German emergency departments - a cross-sectional study.BMC emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Healthcare workers' knowledge, attitudes, and practices on catheter-associated UTI prevention: influencing factors in an OB/GYN hospital.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Factors associated with intent to stay in the profession: an exploratory cluster analysis across healthcare professions in Switzerland.European journal of public health · 2024Article
- Nurses' perceptions regarding their own professionalism attributes to quality neonatal, infant and under-5 childcare.BMC nursing · 2024Article
- International cross-cultural development and field testing of the primary care practice questionnaire for the PaRIS survey (PaRIS-PCPQ).BMC primary care · 2024Article
- The influence of hospital leadership support on burnout, psychological safety, and safety climate for US infection preventionists during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.Infection control and hospital epidemiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPromoting patient and occupational safety are two key challenges for hospitals. When aiming to improve these two outcomes synergistically, psychosocial working conditions, leadership by hospital management and supervisors, and perceptions of patient and occupational safety climate have to be considered. Recent studies have shown that these key topics are interrelated and form a critical foundation for promoting patient and occupational safety in hospitals. So far, these topics have mainly been studied independently from each other. The present study investigated hospital staffs' perceptions of four different topics: (1) psychosocial working conditions, (2) leadership, (3) patient safety climate, and (4) occupational safety climate. We present results from a survey in two German university hospitals aiming to detect differences between nurses and physicians.
methodsWe performed a cross-sectional study using a standardized paper-based questionnaire. The survey was conducted with nurses and physicians to assess the four topics. The instruments mainly consisted of scales of the German version of the COPSOQ (Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire), one scale of the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI), scales to assess leadership and transformational leadership, scales to assess patient safety climate using the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSPSC), and analogous items to assess occupational safety climate.
resultsA total of 995 completed questionnaires out of 2512 distributed questionnaires were returned anonymously. The overall response rate was 39.6%. The sample consisted of 381 physicians and 567 nurses. We found various differences with regard to the four topics. In most of the COPSOQ and the HSPSC-scales, physicians rated psychosocial working conditions and patient safety climate more positively than nurses. With regard to occupational safety, nurses indicated higher occupational risks than physicians.
conclusionsThe WorkSafeMed study combined the assessment of the four topics psychosocial working conditions, leadership, patient safety climate, and occupational safety climate in hospitals. Looking at the four topics provides an overview of where improvements in hospitals may be needed for nurses and physicians. Based on these results, improvements in working conditions, patient safety climate, and occupational safety climate are required for health care professionals in German university hospitals - especially for nurses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.