ArticleBMC plant biology2019
Soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) seedlings response to shading: leaf structure, photosynthesis and proteomic analysis.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 107 citations in OpenAlex.
- Leveraging time-series point clouds for dynamic crop canopy monitoring: Quantifying phenotypic variability and assessing leaf-level photosynthetic contributions.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- Shade-induced transcriptional reprogramming and metabolic adaptation in contrasting soybean genotypes.The plant genome · 2026Article
- Article
- The adaptability of soybean photosynthesis to midday high-light duration through CEF-NPQ coupling regulation.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Transcriptome analysis of shade-induced growth and photosynthetic responses in soybean cultivars.PloS one · 2025Article
- Comparative Analysis of Volatile Compounds and Biochemical Activity ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Tandem mass tag (TMT)-based quantitative proteomics analysis reveals the different responses of contrasting alfalfa varieties to drought stress.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Exploration and genetic analyses of canopy leaf pigmentation changes in soybean (Glycine max L.): unveiling a novel phenotype.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024Article
- Physiological and Transcriptome Responses of Sweet Potato [Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Physiological Characteristics and Transcriptomic Responses ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Physiological and Structural Changes in Leaves ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Under-canopy afforestation after 10 years: assessing the potential of converting monoculture plantations into mixed stands.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Effects of Coverlys TF150International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Maize-legume intercropping achieves yield advantages by improving leaf functions and dry matter partition.BMC plant biology · 2023Article
- Transcriptomic and Metabolomic Analyses Reveal the Key Genes Related to Shade Tolerance in Soybean.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Subcellular Proteomics to Elucidate Soybean Response to Abiotic Stress.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Article
- Investigating the Mechanisms Underlying the Low Irradiance-Tolerance of the Economically Important Seaweed SpeciesLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Quantification of the Cumulative Shading Capacity in a Maize-Soybean Intercropping System Using an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2023Article
- Row ratio increasing improved light distribution, photosynthetic characteristics, and yield of peanut in the maize and peanut strip intercropping system.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIntercropping and close planting are important cultivation methods that increase soybean yield in agricultural production. However, plant shading is a major abiotic stress factor that influences soybean growth and development. Although shade affects leaf morphological parameters and decreases leaf photosynthesis capacity, information on the responses of soybean leaf photosynthesis to shading at proteomic level is still lacking.
resultsCompared with leaves under normal light (CK) treatment, leaves under shading treatment exhibited decreased palisade and spongy tissue thicknesses but significantly increased cell gap. Although shade increased the number of the chloroplast, the thickness of the grana lamella and the photosynthetic pigments per unit mass, but the size of the chloroplast and starch grains and the rate of net photosynthesis decreased compared with those of under CK treatment. A total of 248 differentially expressed proteins, among which 138 were upregulated, and 110 were downregulated, in soybean leaves under shading and CK treatments were detected via isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantification labeling in the three biological repeats. Differentially expressed proteins were classified into 3 large and 20 small groups. Most proteins involved in porphyrin and chlorophyll metabolism, photosynthesis-antenna proteins and carbon fixation in photosynthetic organisms were upregulated. By contrast, proteins involved in photosynthesis were downregulated. The gene family members corresponding to differentially expressed proteins, including protochlorophyllide reductase (Glyma06g247100), geranylgeranyl hydrogenase (Ggh), LHCB1 (Lhcb1) and ferredoxin (N/A) involved in the porphyrin and chlorophyll metabolism, photosynthesis-antenna proteins and photosynthesis pathway were verified with real-time qPCR. The results showed that the expression patterns of the genes were consistent with the expression patterns of the corresponding proteins.
conclusionsThis study combined the variation of the soybean leaf structure and differentially expressed proteins of soybean leaves under shading. These results demonstrated that shade condition increased the light capture efficiency of photosystem II (PSII) in soybean leaves but decreased the capacity from PSII transmitted to photosystem II (PSI). This maybe the major reason that the photosynthetic capacity was decreased in shading.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.