ArticleAppetite2019
A multimodal, naturalistic investigation of relationships between behavioral impulsivity, affect, and binge eating.
Article in Appetite, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Profiling decision-making mechanisms in binge eating disorder.Journal of eating disorders · 2026Article
- Delay discounting and symptoms of anxiety and depression in adolescents experiencing challenges with managing type 1 diabetes.Children's health care : journal of the Association for the Care of Children's Health · 2025Article
- Momentary mechanisms of binge-eating symptoms using ecological momentary assessment: The moderating role of food addiction.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2024Article
- Trajectories of negative affect prior to and following disordered eating behaviors among women with eating disorder pathology: An examination of the role of state-interoception.Journal of psychosomatic research · 2024Article
- Daily Relationship Functioning and Disordered Eating Behaviors Among Sexual Minority Women in Same-Sex Relationships.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2024Article
- Positive affect dysregulation and its relation to binge eating size and frequency.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Associations among affect, diet, and activity and binge-eating severity using ecological momentary assessment in a non-clinical sample of middle-aged fathers.Eating and weight disorders : EWD · 2022Article
- Multi-state modeling of thought-shape fusion using ecological momentary assessment.Body image · 2021Article
- Descriptives and baseline ecological momentary assessed predictors of weight change over the course of psychological treatments for binge eating disorder.Journal of psychosomatic research · 2021Article
- Anhedonia, positive affect dysregulation, and risk and maintenance of binge-eating disorder.The International journal of eating disorders · 2021Article
- Affect Dysregulation in Context: Implications and Future Directions of Experience Sampling Research on Affect Regulation Models of Loss of Control Eating.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Review
- Article
- Emotional eating in healthy individuals and patients with an eating disorder: evidence from psychometric, experimental and naturalistic studies.The Proceedings of the Nutrition Society · 2020Review
- Examining intra-individual variability in food-related inhibitory control and negative affect as predictors of binge eating using ecological momentary assessment.Journal of psychiatric research · 2020Article
- The interplay between self-regulation and affectivity in binge eating among adolescents.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2019Article
- From Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) to Ecological Momentary Intervention (EMI): Past and Future Directions for Ambulatory Assessment and Interventions in Eating Disorders.Current psychiatry reports · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
While binge eating is associated with both emotion regulation deficits and cognitive control impairments related to impulsivity, thus far research has not examined how dimensions of behavioral impulsivity may influence momentary relationships between affect and binge-eating episodes. The present study utilized multimodal methods to examine the extent to which individual differences in impulsive choice (i.e., delay and probabilistic discounting) and impulsive action (i.e., response inhibition) moderated momentary relationships between negative and positive affect (NA and PA) and binge eating measured in the natural environment. Participants were 30 adult women with binge-eating symptoms who completed measures of behavioral impulsivity (i.e., Monetary Choice Questionnaire, Cued Go/No-Go task, Game of Dice Task), followed by a 14-day ecological momentary assessment protocol during which they reported affect levels and binge-eating episodes. Results of generalized estimating equations indicated that greater delay discounting (i.e., preference for immediate, yet smaller rewards) strengthened momentary relationships between both PA and NA and binge eating. However, and unexpectedly, the relationship between momentary PA and binge eating was negative among individuals with greater Cued Go/No-go commission errors, suggesting that higher PA actually attenuated risk of binge episode occurring in these individuals. Together these findings highlight important distinctions between facets of behavioral impulsivity as well as their relationships with affect valence and intensity in predicting binge episodes. Specifically, temporal rather than probabilistic discounting may be most relevant to momentary processes that contribute to binge eating, and promotion of momentary positive affect may be helpful for individuals with poorer response inhibition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.