Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30664679›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2019

Pathway enrichment analysis and visualization of omics data using g:Profiler, GSEA, Cytoscape and EnrichmentMap.

Jüri Reimand, Ruth Isserlin, Veronique Voisin, Mike Kucera, Christian Tannus-Lopes, Asha Rostamianfar, Lina Wadi, Mona Meyer, Jeff Wong, Changjiang Xu and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1,208 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1,208citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1,208 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Medicinal cannabis plant extract (NTI164) modifies epigenetic, ribosomal, and immune pathways in paediatric acute-onset neuropsychiatric syndrome.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026
    Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1,148 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jüri ReimandComputational Biology Program, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Ruth IsserlinThe Donnelly Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6805-2080
Veronique VoisinThe Donnelly Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Mike KuceraThe Donnelly Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Christian Tannus-LopesThe Donnelly Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Asha RostamianfarThe Donnelly Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Lina WadiComputational Biology Program, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Mona MeyerComputational Biology Program, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jeff WongThe Donnelly Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Changjiang XuThe Donnelly Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Daniele MericoDeep Genomics Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3728-4401
Gary D BaderThe Donnelly Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. gary.bader@utoronto.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0185-8861

Funding

TR&D 3 - Network Guided Machine LearningP41GM103504 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI IDEKER, TREY · 2012 to 2024
$17.3M
Software & Hardware Inference Engines for Automated Determination of Primary CellR01CA130826 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI NOLAN, GARRY P · 2008 to 2011
$6.7M
Pathway Commons: Research Resource for Biological PathwaysU41HG006623 · NHGRI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI SANDER, CHRIS · 2012 to 2017
$5.7M
Cytoscape: A Modeling Platform for Biomolecular NetworksR01GM070743 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI IDEKER, TREY · 2004 to 2016
$5.7M
Knowledge-based Gene Expression Analysis for Biomedical and Cancer ResearchR01CA121941 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI MESIROV, JILL P. · 2006 to 2016
$5.1M
Cytoscape: A Modeling Platform for Biomolecular NetworksR01HG009979 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI IDEKER, TREY · 2017 to 2021
$3.5M
MicroRNAs as T cell sensitivity RheostatsR01AI073724 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI NOLAN, GARRY P · 2009 to 2013
$2.0M
Highly multiplexed ion-beam tissue molecular imaging with sub-micron resolutionR33CA183654 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI NOLAN, GARRY P · 2014 to 2016
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA121941NCI NIH HHS R01 CA130826NCI NIH HHS R33 CA183654NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG009979NHGRI NIH HHS U41 HG006623NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI073724NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103504NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM070743
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pathway enrichment analysis helps researchers gain mechanistic insight into gene lists generated from genome-scale (omics) experiments. This method identifies biological pathways that are enriched in a gene list more than would be expected by chance. We explain the procedures of pathway enrichment analysis and present a practical step-by-step guide to help interpret gene lists resulting from RNA-seq and genome-sequencing experiments. The protocol comprises three major steps: definition of a gene list from omics data, determination of statistically enriched pathways, and visualization and interpretation of the results. We describe how to use this protocol with published examples of differentially expressed genes and mutated cancer genes; however, the principles can be applied to diverse types of omics data. The protocol describes innovative visualization techniques, provides comprehensive background and troubleshooting guidelines, and uses freely available and frequently updated software, including g:Profiler, Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA), Cytoscape and EnrichmentMap. The complete protocol can be performed in ~4.5 h and is designed for use by biologists with no prior bioinformatics training.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGene Regulatory NetworksGenome, HumanSoftwareComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticDatasets as TopicGene Expression ProfilingHumansImmunity, InnateNeoplasm ProteinsNeoplasmsProtein Interaction MappingNeoplasm Proteins

Identifiers

PMID30664679
PMCPMC6607905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.