Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30664617›Full record

Trial reportTranslational psychiatry2019

Can targeted metabolomics predict depression recovery? Results from the CO-MED trial.

Andrew H Czysz, Charles South, Bharathi S Gadad, Erland Arning, Abigail Soyombo, Teodoro Bottiglieri, Madhukar H Trivedi

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Translational psychiatry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Metabolomic Biomarkers in Anxiety Disorders.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andrew H CzyszDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA.
Charles SouthDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA.
Bharathi S GadadDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA.
Erland ArningCenter of Metabolomics, Institute of Metabolic Disease, Baylor Scott and White Research Institute, 3812 Elm Street, Dallas, TX, 75226, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0934-0808
Abigail SoyomboDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA.
Teodoro BottiglieriCenter of Metabolomics, Institute of Metabolic Disease, Baylor Scott and White Research Institute, 3812 Elm Street, Dallas, TX, 75226, USA.
Madhukar H TrivediDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA. madhukar.trivedi@utsouthwestern.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2983-1110

Funding

Translational Research Activities in Neuropsychiatry (TRAIN) - Renewal - 1R25MH101078 · NIMH · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI TRIVEDI, MADHUKAR H. · 2014 to 2025
$2.1M
TREATMENT RESISTANT DEPRESSION-278990003N01MH090003 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SW MED CTR/DALLAS · 1999 to 2003
–
NIMH NIH HHS N01 MH090003NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH101078
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metabolomics is a developing and promising tool for exploring molecular pathways underlying symptoms of depression and predicting depression recovery. The AbsoluteIDQ™ p180 kit was used to investigate whether plasma metabolites (sphingomyelins, lysophosphatidylcholines, phosphatidylcholines, and acylcarnitines) from a subset of participants in the Combining Medications to Enhance Depression Outcomes (CO-MED) trial could act as predictors or biologic correlates of depression recovery. Participants in this trial were assigned to one of three pharmacological treatment arms: escitalopram monotherapy, bupropion-escitalopram combination, or venlafaxine-mirtazapine combination. Plasma was collected at baseline in 159 participants and again 12 weeks later at study exit in 83 of these participants. Metabolite concentrations were measured and combined with clinical and sociodemographic variables using the hierarchical lasso to simultaneously model whether specific metabolites are particularly informative of depressive recovery. Increased baseline concentrations of phosphatidylcholine C38:1 showed poorer outcome based on change in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms (QIDS). In contrast, an increased ratio of hydroxylated sphingomyelins relative to non-hydroxylated sphingomyelins at baseline and a change from baseline to exit suggested a better reduction of symptoms as measured by QIDS score. All metabolite-based models performed superior to models only using clinical and sociodemographic variables, suggesting that metabolomics may be a valuable tool for predicting antidepressant outcomes.

Indexed as

MetabolomicsAdultAntidepressive AgentsBiomarkersDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesRegression AnalysisTreatment OutcomeAntidepressive AgentsBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID30664617
PMCPMC6341111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.