Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30664496›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2019

TheraSphere Yttrium-90 Glass Microspheres Combined With Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone in Second-Line Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma of the Liver: Protocol for the EPOCH Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Nikhil Chauhan, Mary F Mulcahy, Riad Salem, Al B Benson Iii, Eveline Boucher, Janet Bukovcan, David Cosgrove, Chantal Laframboise, Robert J Lewandowski, Fayaz Master and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01483027 (A Phase III Clinical Trial Evaluating TheraSphere® in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma of the Liver Who Have Failed First Line Chemotherapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01483027 nacompletednot on this map

A Phase III Clinical Trial Evaluating TheraSphere® in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma of the Liver Who Have Failed First Line Chemotherapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorBoston Scientific CorporationRan2012 to 2020Enrolled428ConditionsColorectal Cancer MetastaticArmsTheraSphere
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Radioembolization With Chemotherapy for Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Randomized, Open-Label, International, Multicenter, Phase III Trial.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2021
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Recommendations for the management of yttrium-90 radioembolization in the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases: a multidisciplinary review.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Radioembolization of Secondary Hepatic Malignancies.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Cerium Containing Bioactive Glasses: A Review.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Biomedical Radioactive Glasses for Brachytherapy.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Nikhil ChauhanResearch and Development, BTG International group companies, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8779-2690
Mary F MulcahyDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Robert H Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6103-0989
Riad SalemDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Robert H Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9745-1825
Al B Benson IiiDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Robert H Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5485-7227
Eveline BoucherResearch and Development, BTG International group companies, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3800-4192
Janet BukovcanResearch and Development, BTG International group companies, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2225-6333
David CosgroveDivision of Medical Oncology, Vancouver Cancer Center, Compass Oncology, Vancouver, WA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2700-5656
Chantal LaframboiseResearch and Development, BTG International group companies, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8448-1686
Robert J LewandowskiDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Robert H Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5510-788X
Fayaz MasterResearch and Development, BTG International group companies, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3217-1475
Bassel El-RayesWinship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2661-5746
Jonathan R StrosbergH Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8405-218X
Daniel Y SzeInterventional Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6885-0752
Ricky A SharmaNational Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, UCL Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4873-9918
BTG International (United Kingdom) · GBNorthwestern University · USCompass Oncology · USEmory University · USMoffitt Cancer Center · USNational Institute for Health Research · GBStanford Medicine · US

Funding

Cancer Research UK 8971
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColorectal cancer is one of the most common cancers and causes of cancer-related death. Up to approximately 70% of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) have metastases to the liver at initial diagnosis. Second-line systemic treatment in mCRC can prolong survival after development of disease progression during or after first-line treatment and in those who are intolerant to first-line treatment.

objectiveThe objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with TheraSphere yttrium-90 (

methodsEPOCH is an open-label, prospective, multicenter, randomized, phase 3 trial being conducted at up to 100 sites in the United States, Canada, Europe, and Asia. Eligible patients have mCRC of the liver and disease progression after first-line chemotherapy with either an oxaliplatin-based or irinotecan-based regimen and are eligible for second-line chemotherapy with the alternate regimen. Patients were randomized 1:1 to the TARE group (chemotherapy with TARE in place of the second chemotherapy infusion and subsequent resumption of chemotherapy) or the control group (chemotherapy alone). The addition of targeted agents is permitted. The primary end points are progression-free survival and hepatic progression-free survival. The study objective will be considered achieved if at least one primary end point is statistically significant. Secondary end points are overall survival, time to symptomatic progression defined as Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status score of 2 or higher, objective response rate, disease control rate, quality-of-life assessment by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal Cancer questionnaire, and adverse events. The study is an adaptive trial, comprising a group sequential design with 2 interim analyses with a planned maximum of 420 patients. The study is designed to detect a 2.5-month increase in median progression-free survival, from 6 months in the control group to 8.5 months in the TARE group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.71), and a 3.5-month increase in median hepatic progression-free survival time, from 6.5 months in the control group to 10 months in the TARE group (HR 0.65). On the basis of simulations, the power to detect the target difference in either progression-free survival or hepatic progression-free survival is >90%, and the power to detect the target difference in each end point alone is >80%.

resultsPatient enrollment ended in October 2018. The first interim analysis in June 2018 resulted in continuation of the study without any changes.

conclusionsThe EPOCH study may contribute toward the establishment of the role of combination therapy with TARE and oxaliplatin- or irinotecan-based chemotherapy in the second-line treatment of mCRC of the liver.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT01483027; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01483027 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/734A6PAYW). INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR1-10.2196/11545.

Indexed as

clinical trial, phase IIIcolorectal neoplasmsmCRCmetastatic colorectal cancermicrospheresneoplasm metastasisrandomized controlled trialresearch designyttrium radioisotopes

Identifiers

PMID30664496
PMCPMC6354199
OpenAlexW2909163269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.