Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30664476›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2019

Additional Telemedicine Rounds as a Successful Performance-Improvement Strategy for Sepsis Management: Observational Multicenter Study.

Robert Deisz, Susanne Rademacher, Katrin Gilger, Rudolf Jegen, Barbara Sauerzapfe, Christina Fitzner, Christian Stoppe, Carina Benstoem, Gernot Marx

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The impact of telehealth in sepsis care: A systematic review.Journal of telemedicine and telecare · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. [TeleCOVID Hessen: implications for the development of new indication areas].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Telemedicine in Intensive Care Units: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Robert Deisz *Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Medical Faculty RWTH Aachen, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1803-7672
Susanne Rademacher *Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Medical Faculty RWTH Aachen, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3214-2236
Katrin GilgerDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Medical Faculty RWTH Aachen, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5519-8657
Rudolf JegenDepartment of Anaesthesiology, St. Elisabeth Hospital, Jülich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8052-0548
Barbara SauerzapfeDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Franziskushospital, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7856-2482
Christina FitznerDepartment of Medical Statistics, Medical Faculty RWTH Aachen, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2242-6013
Christian StoppeDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Medical Faculty RWTH Aachen, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2028-2039
Carina BenstoemDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Medical Faculty RWTH Aachen, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4604-6771
Gernot MarxDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Medical Faculty RWTH Aachen, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0866-4234
RWTH Aachen University · DEFranziskushospital Aachen · DESt. Elisabeth Hospital · CW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSepsis is a major health care problem with high morbidity and mortality rates and affects millions of patients. Telemedicine, defined as the exchange of medical information via electronic communication, improves the outcome of patients with sepsis and decreases the mortality rate and length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU). Additional telemedicine rounds could be an effective component of performance-improvement programs for sepsis, especially in underserved rural areas and hospitals without ready access to critical care physicians.

objectiveOur aim was to evaluate the impact of additional daily telemedicine rounds on adherence to sepsis bundles. We hypothesized that additional telemedicine support may increase adherence to sepsis guidelines and improve the detection rates of sepsis and septic shock.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective, observational, multicenter study between January 2014 and July 2015 with one tele-ICU center and three ICUs in Germany. We implemented telemedicine as part of standard care and collected data continuously during the study. During the daily telemedicine rounds, routine screening for sepsis was conducted and adherence to the Surviving Sepsis Campaign's 3-hour and 6-hour sepsis bundles were evaluated.

resultsIn total, 1168 patients were included in this study, of which 196 were positive for severe sepsis and septic shock. We found that additional telemedicine rounds improved adherence to the 3-hour (Quarter 1, 35% vs Quarter 6, 76.2%; P=.01) and 6-hour (Quarter 1, 50% vs Quarter 6, 95.2%; P=.001) sepsis bundles. In addition, we noted an increase in adherence to the item "Administration of fluids when hypotension" (Quarter 1, 80% vs Quarter 6, 100%; P=.049) of the 3-hour bundle and the item "Remeasurement of lactate" (Quarter 1, 65% vs Quarter 6, 100%, P=.003) of the 6-hour bundle. The ICU length of stay after diagnosis of severe sepsis and septic shock remained unchanged over the observation period. Due to a higher number of patients with sepsis in Quarter 5 (N=60) than in other quarters, we observed stronger effects of the additional rounds on mortality in this quarter (Quarter 1, 50% vs Quarter 5, 23.33%, P=.046).

conclusionsAdditional telemedicine rounds are an effective component of and should be included in performance-improvement programs for sepsis management.

Indexed as

AgedFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSepsisTelemedicineintensive careoutcome improvementsepsissepsis bundle complianceSSCtele-ICUtelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID30664476
PMCPMC6350091
OpenAlexW2910069263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.