Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30664454›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2019

Assessing the Effectiveness of Engaging Patients and Their Families in the Three-Step Fall Prevention Process Across Modalities of an Evidence-Based Fall Prevention Toolkit: An Implementation Science Study.

Megan Duckworth, Jason Adelman, Katherine Belategui, Zinnia Feliciano, Emily Jackson, Srijesa Khasnabish, I-Fong Sun Lehman, Mary Ellen Lindros, Heather Mortimer, Kasey Ryan and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Do patient engagement interventions work for all patients? A systematic review and realist synthesis of interventions to enhance patient safety.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Analysis of Hospital Safety and Risk of Falls in the Elderly: A Cross-Sectional Study in Brazil.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Assessing the environment for engagement in health services: The Audit for Consumer Engagement (ACE) tool.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Use of a perceived efficacy tool to evaluate the FallTIPS program.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Megan DuckworthDivision of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7661-2463
Jason AdelmanNewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University, Manhattan, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7054-2636
Katherine BelateguiDivision of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8702-0327
Zinnia FelicianoDivision of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5268-166X
Emily JacksonNewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University, Manhattan, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4819-6551
Srijesa KhasnabishDivision of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2238-8267
I-Fong Sun LehmanNewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University, Manhattan, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6030-3922
Mary Ellen LindrosMontefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4298-6739
Heather MortimerDivision of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6335-7726
Kasey RyanDivision of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0812-3043
Maureen ScanlanMontefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2476-8412
Linda Berger SpivackMontefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1446-1006
Shao Ping YuNewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University, Manhattan, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8645-9634
David Westfall BatesDivision of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6268-1540
Patricia C DykesDivision of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4597-0732
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USNewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · USMontefiore Medical Center · US

Funding

AHRQ HHS P30 HS023535AHRQ HHS R18 HS025128
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient falls are a major problem in hospitals. The development of a Patient-Centered Fall Prevention Toolkit, Fall TIPS (Tailoring Interventions for Patient Safety), reduced falls by 25% in acute care hospitals by leveraging health information technology to complete the 3-step fall prevention process-(1) conduct fall risk assessments; (2) develop tailored fall prevention plans with the evidence-based interventions; and (3) consistently implement the plan. We learned that Fall TIPS was most effective when patients and family were engaged in all 3 steps of the fall prevention process. Over the past decade, our team developed 3 Fall TIPS modalities-the original electronic health record (EHR) version, a laminated paper version that uses color to provide clinical decision support linking patient-specific risk factors to the interventions, and a bedside display version that automatically populates the bedside monitor with the patients' fall prevention plan based on the clinical documentation in the EHR. However, the relative effectiveness of each Fall TIPS modality for engaging patients and family in the 3-step fall prevention process remains unknown.

objectiveThis study aims to examine if the Fall TIPS modality impacts patient engagement in the 3-step fall prevention process and thus Fall TIPS efficacy.

methodsTo assess patient engagement in the 3-step fall prevention process, we conducted random audits with the question, "Does the patient/family member know their fall prevention plan?" In addition, audits were conducted to measure adherence, defined by the presence of the Fall TIPS poster at the bedside. Champions from 3 hospitals reported data from April to June 2017 on 6 neurology and 7 medical units. Peer-to-peer feedback to reiterate the best practice for patient engagement was central to data collection.

resultsOverall, 1209 audits were submitted for the patient engagement measure and 1401 for the presence of the Fall TIPS poster at the bedside. All units reached 80% adherence for both measures. While some units maintained high levels of patient engagement and adherence with the poster protocol, others showed improvement over time, reaching clinically significant adherence (>80%) by the final month of data collection.

conclusionsEach Fall TIPS modality effectively facilitates patient engagement in the 3-step fall prevention process, suggesting all 3 can be used to integrate evidence-based fall prevention practices into the clinical workflow. The 3 Fall TIPS modalities may prove an effective strategy for the spread, allowing diverse institutions to choose the modality that fits with the organizational culture and health information technology infrastructure.

Indexed as

Implementation ScienceAccidental FallsHumansMedical InformaticsPatient Participationclinical decision supportfall preventionfall prevention toolkithealth information technologyimplementation sciencepatient safety

Identifiers

PMID30664454
PMCPMC6360379
OpenAlexW2897530328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.