ArticleMolecular medicine reports2019
Bioinformatics analysis of sex differences in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy.
Article in Molecular medicine reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lagging behind the Western countries: the knowledge gaps of gender differences in heart failure in Asia.ESC heart failure · 2023Review
- Genetic Diagnostic Yield and Novel Causal Genes of Congenital Heart Disease.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Sex differences in disease progression and arrhythmic risk in patients with arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2021Article
- Cardiomyopathies in China: A 2018-2019 state-of-the-art review.Chronic diseases and translational medicine · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is an inherited disease that exhibits sex differences on clinical presentation. The present study aimed to investigate the sex differences associated with ARVC by conducting an integrated bioinformatics analysis. The GSE29819 gene expression dataset was downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database. The online analytical tool GEO2R was then used to screen for differentially expressed genes (DEGs), which were subsequently processed using enrichment analysis and protein‑protein interaction (PPI) network construction. Functional annotation of the DEGs was determined using ClueGO. The PPI network was constructed with Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes, and was visualized with Cytoscape to identify the modules and hub genes. Compared with the female group, a total of 1,188 DEGs, of which 915 were upregulated and 273 were downregulated, were identified in the male group. The enrichment analysis revealed that in KEGG pathways, the upregulated DEGs were substantially enriched in the 'nicotine addiction' pathways, whereas the downregulated DEGS were mainly enriched in the 'ECM‑receptor interaction' and 'protein digestion and absorption' pathways. The PPI network contained 899 nodes and 1,627 edges, among which four significant modules were identified. In addition, kininogen 1, lysophosphatidic acid receptor 5, formyl peptide receptor (FPR) 2, adenylate cyclase 2, γ‑aminobutyric acid type B receptor subunit 2, FPR1, hydroxycarboxylic acid receptor 1, prostaglandin E receptor 3, cannabinoid receptor 1 and proenkephalin were identified as the top 10 hub genes. The key genes and related pathways identified in this study provide genetic insight into the diversity in phenotypes between female and male patients with ARVC, and may facilitate therapeutic individualization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.