Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30664120›Full record

ReviewRetina (Philadelphia, Pa.)2019

STEM CELL THERAPIES, GENE-BASED THERAPIES, OPTOGENETICS, AND RETINAL PROSTHETICS: Current State and Implications for the Future.

Edward H Wood, Peter H Tang, Irina De la Huerta, Edward Korot, Stephanie Muscat, Daniel A Palanker, George A Williams

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Impact of Photoreceptor Loss on Retinal Circuitry.Annual review of vision science · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Gene Therapy to the Retina and the Cochlea.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  15. Sourcing Photoreceptor-like Cells for Treating Vision Loss.The New England journal of medicine · 2020
    Article
  16. In vivo locus-specific editing of the neuroepigenome.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Optical stimulation of neural tissue.Healthcare technology letters · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Smart polymers for cell therapy and precision medicine.Journal of biomedical science · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Edward H WoodAssociated Retinal Consultants, Royal Oak, Michigan.
Peter H TangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Irina De la HuertaAssociated Retinal Consultants, Royal Oak, Michigan.
Edward KorotOakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, Michigan.
Stephanie MuscatStanford University, Stanford, California.
Daniel A PalankerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
George A WilliamsAssociated Retinal Consultants, Royal Oak, Michigan.
Stanford University · USAssociated Retinal Consultants · USOakland University · US

Funding

High Resolution Photovoltaic Retinal ProsthesisR01EY018608 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PALANKER, DANIEL V · 2009 to 2016
$9.2M
Photovoltaic Subretinal Prosthesis with High Pixel DensityR01EY027786 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PALANKER, DANIEL V · 2017 to 2021
$3.3M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY018608NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027786
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo review and discuss current innovations and future implications of promising biotechnology and biomedical offerings in the field of retina. We focus on therapies that have already emerged as clinical offerings or are poised to do so.

methodsLiterature review and commentary focusing on stem cell therapies, gene-based therapies, optogenetic therapies, and retinal prosthetic devices.

resultsThe technologies discussed herein are some of the more recent promising biotechnology and biomedical developments within the field of retina. Retinal prosthetic devices and gene-based therapies both have an FDA-approved product for ophthalmology, and many other offerings (including optogenetics) are in the pipeline. Stem cell therapies offer personalized medicine through novel regenerative mechanisms but entail complex ethical and reimbursement challenges.

conclusionStem cell therapies, gene-based therapies, optogenetics, and retinal prosthetic devices represent a new era of biotechnological and biomedical progress. These bring new ethical, regulatory, care delivery, and reimbursement challenges. By addressing these issues proactively, we may accelerate delivery of care to patients in a safe, efficient, and value-based manner.

Indexed as

ForecastingVisual ProsthesisGenetic TherapyHumansOptogeneticsRetinal DegenerationStem Cell Transplantation

Identifiers

PMID30664120
PMCPMC6492547
OpenAlexW2910794902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.