Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30663331›Full record

ArticleJournal of behavioral addictions2019

A clinical evaluation of the DSM-5 criteria for Internet Gaming Disorder and a pilot study on their applicability to further Internet-related disorders.

Kai W Müller, Manfred E Beutel, Michael Dreier, Klaus Wölfling

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of behavioral addictions, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Professional Esports Players: Motivation and Physical Activity Levels.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kai W MüllerOutpatient Clinic for Behavioral Addiction, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy,University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz,Germany.
Manfred E BeutelDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy,University Medical Centre, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz,Germany.
Michael DreierOutpatient Clinic for Behavioral Addiction, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy,University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz,Germany.
Klaus WölflingOutpatient Clinic for Behavioral Addiction, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy,University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz,Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsInternet Gaming Disorder (IGD) and other Internet-related disorders (IRDs) have become growing health concerns in our today's lives. Based on defined diagnostic criteria, IGD has been recognized as a condition for further research in the DSM-5; however, other IRDs have been excluded. Since the release of the DSM-5, representativeness and appropriateness of the nine diagnostic criteria have been debated. Although some first evidence has been published to evaluate these criteria, our knowledge is still limited. Thus, the purpose of this study was to provide data on the clinical validity of the DSM-5 criteria for IGD and other types of IRD. We were also interested in examining the additional diagnostic validity of craving that is currently not being considered in the DSM-5.

methodsAnalyses on a sample of n = 166 treatment seekers for IRDs were performed. The clinician's diagnosis was used as a main reference for determining the DSM criteria's diagnostic performance. Secondary criteria (depression and anxiety) were defined as indicators for the construct validity.

resultsThe overall diagnostic accuracy ranged between 76.6% for deceiving and 92% for loss of control and craving. Considerable differences occurred in the degree of sensitivity and specificity between the single criteria. No particular differences were found for the applicability of the criteria to other forms of IRDs. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsOur results confirm the validity of the DSM criteria. However, the diagnostic utility of the criterion escaping aversive moods is critically discussed. Considering craving as an additional diagnostic indicator might be recommendable.

Indexed as

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersInternetVideo GamesAdolescentAdultBehavior, AddictiveCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMalePilot ProjectsPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesReproducibility of ResultsYoung Adultclinical validitydiagnostic accuracyDSM-5Internet addictionInternet Gaming DisorderInternet-related disorders

Identifiers

PMID30663331
PMCPMC7044592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.