Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30662916›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2018

Hearing Loss Characteristics of Workers with Hypertension Exposed to Occupational Noise: A Cross-Sectional Study of 270,033 Participants.

Boshen Wang, Lei Han, Simin Dai, Xiuting Li, Wenyan Cai, Dandan Yang, Lin Chen, Ning Wang, Baoli Zhu, Juan Zhang

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Hearing Loss and Hypertension: A Literature Review.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Boshen WangKey Laboratory of Environmental Medicine Engineering of Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, Jiangsu, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2366-2168
Lei HanJiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Nanjing 210009, Jiangsu, China.
Simin DaiNational Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, China.
Xiuting LiNanjing Prevention and Treatment Center for Occupational Diseases, Nanjing 210042, Jiangsu, China.
Wenyan CaiJiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Nanjing 210009, Jiangsu, China.
Dandan YangJiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Nanjing 210009, Jiangsu, China.
Lin ChenKey Laboratory of Environmental Medicine Engineering of Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, Jiangsu, China.
Ning WangKey Laboratory of Environmental Medicine Engineering of Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, Jiangsu, China.
Baoli ZhuKey Laboratory of Environmental Medicine Engineering of Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, Jiangsu, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4345-0154
Juan ZhangKey Laboratory of Environmental Medicine Engineering of Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, Jiangsu, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4974-4540
Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CNSoutheast University · CNNational Institute for Parasitic Diseases · CNWuhan Prevention and Treatment Center for Occupational Diseases · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study investigated the hearing loss characteristics among occupational noise exposure workers with hypertension and the link between hypertension and hearing loss when exposed to occupational noise.

methodsA total of 267,766 occupational noise-exposed workers were enrolled, including 29,868 workers with hypertension and 240,165 without hypertension. Hypertension was diagnosed according to WHO criteria. Hypertension was classified into four grades based on blood pressure. Assessment of hearing was performed through measurement of an unadulterated tone threshold at different frequencies, which ranged between 250 and 8,000 Hz.

resultsA substantial link was observed to exist between hypertension and the increment in the hearing limit. The increase in the hearing threshold was substantially higher among those having grade 2 hypertension.

conclusionThe current investigation suggested patients with hypertension exhibit a substantial rise in hearing loss in comparison with patients without hypertension. The rise in hearing loss was significant in patients with grade 2 hypertension. Efficient and practicable measures are required to decrease the hearing loss in workers with hypertension and work-related noise exposure.

Indexed as

AdultAuditory ThresholdCross-Sectional StudiesDeafnessFemaleHearing Loss, Noise-InducedHumansHypertensionMaleNoise, OccupationalOccupational DiseasesOccupational Exposure

Identifiers

PMID30662916
PMCPMC6313990
OpenAlexW2905522062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.