ArticleFrontiers in chemistry2018
γ-Secretase Studied by Atomistic Molecular Dynamics Simulations: Global Dynamics, Enzyme Activation, Water Distribution and Lipid Binding.
Article in Frontiers in chemistry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- From mechanistic modeling to AI-driven design: computational strategies for targeting the γ-secretase complex.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Selective Protonation of Catalytic Dyad for γ-Secretase-Mediated Hydrolysis Revealed by Multiscale Simulations.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2024Article
- Enzyme-substrate hybrid β-sheet controls geometry and water access to the γ-secretase active site.Communications biology · 2023Article
- Effects of presenilin-1 familial Alzheimer's disease mutations on γ-secretase activation for cleavage of amyloid precursor protein.Communications biology · 2023Article
- A thermodynamic investigation of amyloid precursor protein processing by human γ-secretase.Communications biology · 2022Article
- Structure and mechanism of the γ-secretase intramembrane protease complex.Current opinion in structural biology · 2022Review
- Mechanism of Tripeptide Trimming of Amyloid β-Peptide 49 by γ-Secretase.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2022Article
- Role of cholesterol in substrate recognition by [Formula: see text]-secretase.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- The Role of Cholesterol in Amyloidogenic Substrate Binding to the γ-Secretase Complex.Biomolecules · 2021Article
- Amyloid Oligomers: A Joint Experimental/Computational Perspective on Alzheimer's Disease, Parkinson's Disease, Type II Diabetes, and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.Chemical reviews · 2021Review
- Protein Predictive Modeling and Simulation of Mutations of Presenilin-1 Familial Alzheimer's Disease on the Orthosteric Site.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021Article
- Side-by-side comparison of Notch- and C83 binding to γ-secretase in a complete membrane model at physiological temperature.RSC advances · 2020Article
- Mechanisms of γ-Secretase Activation and Substrate Processing.ACS central science · 2020Article
- Structure and dynamics of γ-secretase with presenilin 2 compared to presenilin 1.RSC advances · 2019Article
- Modulating Hinge Flexibility in the APP Transmembrane Domain Alters γ-Secretase Cleavage.Biophysical journal · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
γ-secretase, an intramembrane-cleaving aspartyl protease is involved in the cleavage of a large number of intramembrane proteins. The most prominent substrate is the amyloid precursor protein, whose proteolytic processing leads to the production of different amyloid Aβ peptides. These peptides are known to form toxic aggregates and may play a key role in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Recently, the three-dimensional structure of γ-secretase has been determined via Cryo-EM, elucidating the spatial geometry of this enzyme complex in different functional states. We have used molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to study the global dynamics and conformational transitions of γ-secretase, as well as the water and lipid distributions in and around the transmembrane domains in atomic detail. Simulations were performed on the full enzyme complex and on the membrane embedded parts alone. The simulations revealed global motions compatible with the experimental enzyme structures and indicated little dependence of the dynamics of the transmembrane domains on the soluble extracellular subunits. During the simulation on the membrane spanning part a transition between an inactive conformation (with catalytic residues far apart) toward a putatively active form (with catalytic residues in close proximity) has been observed. This conformational change is associated with a distinct rearrangement of transmembrane helices, a global compaction of the catalytically active presenilin subunit a change in the water structure near the active site and a rigidification of the protein fold. The observed conformational rearrangement allows the interpretation of the effect of several mutations on the activity of γ-secretase. A number of long-lived lipid binding sites could be identified on the membrane spanning surface of γ-secretase which may coincide with association regions of hydrophobic membrane helices to form putative substrate binding exosites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.