ReviewInternational journal of ophthalmology2019
Image-guided lens extraction surgery: a systematic review.
Review in International journal of ophthalmology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Level of Agreement of Intraocular Lens Power Measurements Between a Swept-Source OCT Biometer and a Partial Coherence Interferometer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Comparison of two digital alignment systems for toric intraocular lens implantation.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Rotational stability and refractive outcomes of the DFT/DATx15 toric, extended depth of focus intraocular lens.International ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Exploring multi-level risk factors and post-war burdens of trachomatous trichiasis among displaced population in Raya Kobo districts, implication for urgent action.International journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Comparison of INTEGRA and the Manual Method to Determine the Axis for Intraocular Lens Implantation-A Case Series of 60 Eyes.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Assessment of posture-induced cyclotorsion during cataract surgery using the Verion image-guided system.Medical journal, Armed Forces India · 2021Article
- Rotational stability of modified toric intraocular lens.PloS one · 2021Article
- Rotational slit-beam marking: an advanced manual corneal astigmatic marking method for toric intraocular lens implantation.International ophthalmology · 2020Article
- Comparison of the Orientation of the Corneal Steep Meridian Determined by Image-Guided System and Manual Method in the Same Eye.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2020Article
- Intraoperative Aberrometer Plus Image-guided System for Astigmatism Correction Compared to Standard Image-guided System for Significant Lens Opacity.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A systematic review of the recent literature regarding the current image-guided systems used for cataract surgery or refractive lens exchange was performed based on the PubMed and Google Scholar databases in March 2018. Literature review returned 21 eligible studies. These studies compared image-guided systems with other keratometric devices regarding their accuracy, repeatability and reproducibility in measurement of keratometric values, astigmatism magnitude and axis, as well as in IOL power calculation. Additionally, the image-guided systems were compared with conventional manual ink-marking techniques for the alignment of toric IOLs. In conclusion, image-guided systems seem to be an accurate and reliable technology with measurements of high repeatability and reproducibility regarding the keratometry and IOL power calculation, but not yet interchangeable with the current established and validated keratometric devices. However, they are superior over the conventional manual ink-marking techniques for toric IOL alignment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.