ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2019
The association between socioeconomic status and visual disability among older adults in China.
Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Visual Impairment and Cancer Risk: A Nationwide Cohort Study of Adult Swedish Men and Women.Cancers · 2025Article
- Socioeconomic and Health Characteristics as Predictors of Social Support in Elderly People with Visual Impairment: Evidence from Serbia.Iranian journal of public health · 2024Article
- Association between Socioeconomic Status and Vision Screening Outcomes among Preschool Children in Klang Valley, Malaysia: A Cross-Sectional Study.The Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo investigate the association between socioeconomic status (SES) and visual disability (VD) among older Chinese adults.
methodsWe obtained data from the Second National Sample Survey on Disability, conducted in China in 2006. A total number of 192 375 older adults (aged≥65y) were screened for suspected VD
resultsVD was prevalent among 7.29% of Chinese adults aged 65 and older, and was higher in rural areas (8.71%) than in urban areas (4.82%). After adjusting for SES indicators and covariates, we found that less-educated older adults were more likely to suffer from VD, with an odds ratio (OR) of 2.50 (95%CI: 2.26-2.82) for illiterates, compared with those who graduated from senior high school or above. Older adults who were in the lowest income quintile were more at risk of VD, with an OR of 1.81 (95%CI: 1.68-2.95), compared with adults in the highest income quintile. In urban areas, when compared with adults who graduated from senior high school or above, those who did not continue their education after junior high school, primary school, or those who were illiterate, were more likely to suffer from VD, with an OR of 1.35 (95%CI: 1.51-1.59), 1.84 (95%CI: 1.60-2.12), and 2.63 (95%CI: 2.27-3.04), respectively. Lower levels of income were statistically significant when associated with VD. In rural areas, adults who were illiterate had an OR of 2.21 (95%CI: 1.75-2.79) when compared to adults with senior high school or above education level.
conclusionIndividual-level SES among the elderly, in the form of education and income, is associated with VD among elderly Chinese adults in both urban and rural areas; however, the association is stronger in rural areas. Further studies are still required to explore the mechanism behind the relationships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.