ArticleNanotheranostics2019
Comparing Semiconductor Nanocrystal Toxicity in Pregnant Mice and Non-Human Primates.
Article in Nanotheranostics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advances of oral micro- and nanomedicines for modulating intestinal barriers in the treatment of intestinal diseases.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026Review
- A Review of in vivo Toxicity of Quantum Dots in Animal Models.International journal of nanomedicine · 2023Review
- Multiplexed imaging in oncology.Nature biomedical engineering · 2022Review
- DNA Nanostructures and DNA-Functionalized Nanoparticles for Cancer Theranostics.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2020Review
- Recent insights on indirect mechanisms in developmental toxicity of nanomaterials.Particle and fibre toxicology · 2020Review
- Biodistribution and acute toxicity of cadmium-free quantum dots with different surface functional groups in mice following intratracheal inhalation.Nanotheranostics · 2020Article
- Quantum dots in biomedical applications.Acta biomaterialia · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.