Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30662708›Full record

ArticleBone & joint research2018

Different composition of leucocytes in cortical and cancellous bone healing in a mouse model.

L Tätting, O Sandberg, M Bernhardsson, J Ernerudh, P Aspenberg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone & joint research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Bioactive materials · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

L TättingDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Orthopaedics, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
O SandbergPrincipal Research Engineer, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Orthopaedics, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
M BernhardssonDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Orthopaedics, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
J ErnerudhDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine and Department of Clinical Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
P AspenbergLinköping, Sweden.
Linköping University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCortical and cancellous bone healing processes appear to be histologically different. They also respond differently to anti-inflammatory agents. We investigated whether the leucocyte composition on days 3 and 5 after cortical and cancellous injuries to bone was different, and compared changes over time using day 3 as the baseline.

methodsTen-week-old male C56/Bl6J mice were randomized to either cancellous injury in the proximal tibia or cortical injury in the femoral diaphysis. Regenerating tissues were analyzed with flow cytometry at days 3 and 5, using panels with 15 antibodies for common macrophage and lymphocyte markers. The cellular response from day 3 to 5 was compared in order to identify differences in how cancellous and cortical bone healing develop.

resultsBetween day 3 and 5, the granulocytes increased in the cancellous model, whereas the lymphocytes (T cells, B cells, NK cells) and monocytes (CD11b+, F4/80+, CD206+, CD14+) increased in the cortical model.

conclusionThese results suggest an acute type of inflammation in cancellous bone healing, and a more chronic inflammation in cortical healing. This might explain, in part, why cancellous healing is faster and more resistant to anti-inflammatory drugs than are diaphyseal fractures.

Indexed as

CancellousCorticalDiaphysealFractureIntramembranousMetaphyseal

Identifiers

PMID30662708
PMCPMC6318753
OpenAlexW2903459349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.