Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30662686›Full record

ArticleOrthopedic reviews2018

Effectiveness of lumbar orthoses in low back pain: Review of the literature and our results.

Cordelia Schott, Sonja Zirke, Jillian Marie Schmelzle, Christel Kaiser, Lluis Aguilar I Fernández

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopedic reviews, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Role of Orthoses in Chronic Axial Spinal Conditions.Current pain and headache reports · 2024
    Review
  6. Presentation, Diagnosis, and Management of Lower Back Pain Associated with Spinal Stenosis: A Narrative Review.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Cordelia SchottInstitut für Wirbelsäulenforschung, Essen, Germany.
Sonja ZirkeInstitut für Wirbelsäulenforschung, Bochum, Germany.
Jillian Marie SchmelzleAmerican Society of Anesthesiologists, MacNeal Hospital, Berwyn, IL, USA.
Christel KaiserDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital, Essen, Germany.
Lluis Aguilar I FernándezClínica Corachán, Barcelona, Spain.
American Society of Anesthesiologists · USEssen University Hospital · DERWI – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research · DEWirbelsäulen-Institut München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Back pain and diseases of the spine are today a health disorder of outstanding epidemiological, medical, and health economic importance. The cost of care for patients with lumbosciatic complaints are steadily increasing. Accordingly, the guidelines and treatments are constantly renewed. One concept is the orthotic care. In the following we want to give an overview of the literature and the effectiveness of lumbar orthoses in low back pain supplemented by our own data. A prospective randomized study with 230 patients, divided into three groups, each with two subgroups. Three Orthoses by the TIGGES-Zours GmbH were prescribed; a demountable two-step lumbar orthosis, three-step bridging orthosis and a four-step flexion orthosis modular system. Each were compared to the nonmodular equivalent. All six groups showed improvement in pain intensity and functional capacity at 6 and 12 weeks. The modular groups were found to have improvement in the frequency of use. The subjective effectiveness and sensitivity for the modular and non-modular groups was assessed as being good. In the literature, there are no clear guidelines for an orthotic supply. The studies do not seem to be meaningful and universal due to the difficult ascertainability of pain. There is a need for further research here. Nevertheless, the authors of this review are of the opinion that the implementation of trunk orthoses is void of side effects and beneficial to patients. The modular systems seem to have an advantage as well as higher patient satisfaction.

Indexed as

Low back and leg painLow back painLumbar orthosisModular orthosis systemOff-training measuresTherapeutically correct modular treatment

Identifiers

PMID30662686
PMCPMC6315306
OpenAlexW2904131220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.