Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30662526›Full record

ArticleJournal of Cancer2019

Comparison of Clinicopathological Features and Prognosis between

Pupu Li, Qiongqiong Gao, Xiangli Jiang, Zhongli Zhan, Qingna Yan, Zhaona Li, Chun Huang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Pupu LiTianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer.
Qiongqiong GaoTianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer.
Xiangli JiangTianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer.
Zhongli ZhanTianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer.
Qingna YanTianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer.
Zhaona LiTianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer.
Chun HuangTianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer.
Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital · CNNational Clinical Research · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA number of mutations in key oncogenes have been identified as important for the initiation and maintenance of lung adenocarcinoma (LAC). This study elucidated the prevalence and prognostic significance of mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor gene ( PATIENTS AND

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 675 consecutive patients who underwent radical resection at a single institution. We concurrently analyzed mutations in

result

conclusionClinicopathological features of LAC with

Indexed as

ALKDFSEGFRhistological subtypelung adenocarcinoma

Identifiers

PMID30662526
PMCPMC6329857
OpenAlexW2905150293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.