Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30662463›Full record

ArticleJournal of oncology2018

Homocysteine and Digestive Tract Cancer Risk: A Dose-Response Meta-Analysis.

Jun Xu, Xin Zhao, Shanwen Sun, Peng Ni, Chujun Li, Anjing Ren, Wei Wang, Lingjun Zhu

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jun XuDepartment of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1419-8228
Xin ZhaoDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2860-5899
Shanwen SunDepartment of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6760-2730
Peng NiDepartment of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1232-1245
Chujun LiDepartment of Plastic and Burns Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7108-4457
Anjing RenDepartment of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9915-3936
Wei WangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9027-5566
Lingjun ZhuDepartment of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8033-1528
Jiangsu Province Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHomocysteine, a key component in one-carbon metabolism, is of great importance in remethylation. Many epidemiologic studies have assessed the association between homocysteine and risk of digestive tract cancer, but the results are inconsistent.

objectiveThe objective of our meta-analysis is to assess the association between homocysteine and digestive tract cancer risk.

methodsComprehensive searches were performed on the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases up to September 25, 2018, to identify relevant studies. Thirteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. Odds ratios (ORs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were used to estimate the strength of the relationship between homocysteine and the risk of digestive tract cancer.

resultsThe pooled OR of digestive tract cancer risk for patients with the highest categories of blood homocysteine levels versus the lowest categories was 1.27 (95% CI, 1.15, 1.39) with no significant heterogeneity observed (

conclusionGenerally, our results indicated that elevated homocysteine was associated with higher risk of digestive tract cancer. That is, homocysteine concentration may be a potential biomarker for occurrence of digestive tract cancer.

Identifiers

PMID30662463
PMCPMC6312580
OpenAlexW2904602616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.