Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30662223›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine2018

The Utilization of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign Care Bundles in the Treatment of Pediatric Patients with Severe Sepsis or Septic Shock in a Resource-Limited Environment: A Prospective Multicenter Trial.

Rujipat Samransamruajkit, Kawiwan Limprayoon, Rojanee Lertbunrian, Rattapon Uppala, Chutima Samathakanee, Pravit Jetanachai, Nopparat Thamsiri

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Prokineticin-2 and Procalcitonin's Diagnostic Accuracy for Sepsis in Critically Ill Patients: A Prospective Observational Study.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. [Paediatric Life Support].Notfall & rettungsmedizin · 2021
    Review
  8. Sometimes more is not always better: ScvOIntensive care medicine · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Rujipat SamransamruajkitDivision of Pediatric Critical Care, Faculty of Medicine, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Kawiwan LimprayoonDivision of Pediatric Critical Care, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Rojanee LertbunrianDivision of Pediatric Critical Care, Ramathibodi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Rattapon UppalaDivision of Pediatric Pulmonary and Critical Care, Khon Kaen University Hospital, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Chutima SamathakaneeDivision of Pediatric Pulmonary and Critcal care, Hat Yai Hospital, Songkhla Province, Thailand.
Pravit JetanachaiDivision of Pediatric Pulmonary and Critical Care, Queen Sirikit National Institute of Child Health, Bangkok, Thailand.
Nopparat ThamsiriDivision of Pediatric Pulmonary and Critical Care, Vachira Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Hatyai Hospital · THKhon Kaen University · THKing Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital · THMahidol University · THQueen Sirikit National Institute of Child Health · THRamathibodi Hospital · THVajira Hospital · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSepsis is a common condition affecting the lives of infants and children worldwide. Although implementation of the surviving sepsis campaign (SSC) care bundles was once believed to be effective in reducing sepsis mortality rates, the approach has recently been questioned.

methodsThe study was a prospective, interventional, multicenter trial. Infants and children aged 1 month to 15 years in seven different large academic centers in Thailand who had been diagnosed with severe sepsis or septic shock. They were given treatment based on the SSC care bundles.

resultsA total of 519 children with severe sepsis or septic shock were enrolled in the study. Among these, 188 were assigned to the intervention group and 331 were recruited to the historical case-control group. There were no significant differences in the baseline clinical characteristics. The intervention group was administered a significantly higher fluid bolus than was the control group (28.3 ± 17.2 cc/kg vs. 17.7 ± 10.6 cc/kg;

conclusionOur study demonstrated a significant reduction in sepsis mortality after the implementation of the SSC care bundles. Early diagnosis of the disease, optimum hemodynamic resuscitation, and timely antibiotic administration are the key elements of sepsis management.

Indexed as

Decrease in mortalitymulticenterpediatricseptic shocksevere sepsissurviving sepsis campaign care bundles

Identifiers

PMID30662223
PMCPMC6311978
OpenAlexW2903950161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.