Trial reportClinical nutrition ESPEN2019
Vitamin A treatment for severe sepsis in humans; a prospective randomized double blind placebo-controlled clinical trial.
Trial report in Clinical nutrition ESPEN, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current and emerging therapeutic options for refractory septic shock: A systematic review.World journal of critical care medicine · 2025Article
- What do we know about micronutrients in critically ill patients? A narrative review.JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition · 2025Review
- Recent advances in understanding oxidative stress in sepsis: pathogenic roles and antioxidant therapeutic prospects - a narrative review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Causal effects of genetically vitamins and sepsis risk: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study.BMC infectious diseases · 2023Article
- Oxygen therapy for sepsis and prevention of complications.Acute and critical care · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo test the benefits of Vitamin A treatment in patients with sepsis on length of time in ICU, days on ventilator, days on intravenous blood pressure support and 28-day mortality. The trial was prospective, randomized and double-blind. As part of a larger sepsis trial, 63 patients with sepsis were randomized to receive either 100,000 IU of Vitamin A intramuscular or placebo over 7-days. Data analysis was by ANOVA with two tailed test and p < 0.05 as significant.
resultsThe mean age was 51 ± 2 (mean ± SEM) with 54% female. Groups were well matched with regards to APACHE III score, WBC count, and incidence of bacteremia. In addition, all patients had an ACTH stimulation test using 250 mcg of ACTH IV and serum cortisol was measured at time 0, 30 and 60 min. Baseline cortisol of 24.6 ± 1 mg/dl increased to 41 ± 2 mg/dl at 30 min and 49 ± 2 at 60 min. There was no significant difference between the groups. All cortisol responses were greater than 11.9 mg/dl. Serum Vitamin A level was below normal in 54% of the patients. After randomization, 100,000 IU of Vitamin A daily was given to 32 patients and blinded placebo was given daily to 32 patients for seven days. This was administered as a 1 cc injection of either medication or placebo and was blinded from all but the research pharmacist. The number of days in the ICU was slightly, but not significantly reduced (p = 0.39) by approximately 2 days in the Vitamin A treated patients. The average number of days on blood pressure agents and the day on ventilator were similar. The 28-day mortality rates were similar between the two groups (28 vs 34% placebo vs Vitamin A group). Seven days of high dose intramuscular Vitamin A treatment in patients with sepsis where approximately 50% were vitamin A deficient had no benefit in adults with sepsis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.