Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30661454›Full record

SynthesisJournal of neurotrauma2019

A Systematic Review of Closed Head Injury Models of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Mice and Rats.

Colleen N Bodnar, Kelly N Roberts, Emma K Higgins, Adam D Bachstetter

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of neurotrauma, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 104 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
104citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

104 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

44 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Colleen N Bodnar1 Department of Neuroscience, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
Kelly N Roberts1 Department of Neuroscience, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
Emma K Higgins1 Department of Neuroscience, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
Adam D Bachstetter1 Department of Neuroscience, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.

Funding

Protein CoreP30GM110787 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI MENDENHALL, MICHAEL D. · 2014 to 2018
$5.7M
Involvement of myelin integrity in Alzheimer's disease pathogenesisR00AG044445 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI BACHSTETTER, ADAM D · 2016 to 2018
$732k
NIA NIH HHS R00 AG044445NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM110787
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mild TBI (mTBI) is a significant health concern. Animal models of mTBI are essential for understanding mechanisms, and pathological outcomes, as well as to test therapeutic interventions. A variety of closed head models of mTBI that incorporate different aspects (i.e., biomechanics) of the mTBI have been reported. The aim of the current review was to compile a comprehensive list of the closed head mTBI rodent models, along with the common data elements, and outcomes, with the goal to summarize the current state of the field. Publications were identified from a search of PubMed and Web of Science and screened for eligibility following PRISMA guidelines. Articles were included that were closed head injuries in which the authors classified the injury as mild in rats or mice. Injury model and animal-specific common data elements, as well as behavioral and histological outcomes, were collected and compiled from a total of 402 articles. Our results outline the wide variety of methods used to model mTBI. We also discovered that female rodents and both young and aged animals are under-represented in experimental mTBI studies. Our findings will aid in providing context comparing the injury models and provide a starting point for the selection of the most appropriate model of mTBI to address a specific hypothesis. We believe this review will be a useful starting place for determining what has been done and what knowledge is missing in the field to reduce the burden of mTBI.

Indexed as

Brain ConcussionDisease Models, AnimalHead Injuries, ClosedAnimalsMiceRatsanimal modelscommon data elementsconcussion

Identifiers

PMID30661454
PMCPMC6555186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.