Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30661320›Full record

ArticleAllergy, asthma & immunology research2019

Higher Binding Affinity and

Mark Liddament, Jean Husten, Tanya Estephan, David Laine, David Mabon, Laurie Pukac, Jacquelyn Lyons, Adam W Clarke, Anthony Doyle

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Allergy, asthma & immunology research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Repurposing of Chemotherapeutics to Combat COVID-19.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mark LiddamentR&D, Biologics Lead Antibody Discovery, Teva Pharmaceuticals Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia. mark.liddament@tevapharm.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8130-3972
Jean HustenR&D, Biologics, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, West Chester, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6137-831X
Tanya EstephanR&D, Biologics Lead Antibody Discovery, Teva Pharmaceuticals Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia. mark.liddament@tevapharm.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5224-9591
David LaineR&D, Biologics Lead Antibody Discovery, Teva Pharmaceuticals Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9809-0571
David MabonR&D, Biologics Lead Antibody Discovery, Teva Pharmaceuticals Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8938-8368
Laurie PukacR&D, Biologics, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, West Chester, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5767-2172
Jacquelyn LyonsR&D, Biologics, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, West Chester, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0437-6307
Adam W ClarkeR&D, Biologics Lead Antibody Discovery, Teva Pharmaceuticals Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Anthony DoyleR&D, Biologics Lead Antibody Discovery, Teva Pharmaceuticals Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Teva Pharmaceuticals (Australia) · AUTeva Pharmaceuticals (United States) · US

Funding

Teva Pharmaceutical Industries
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reslizumab and mepolizumab are recently approved monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of severe (uncontrolled) eosinophilic asthma. Both are effective in neutralizing the function of interleukin-5 (IL-5). This study is the first to compare the binding affinity and

Indexed as

antibody affinitydrug evaluation, preclinicalinterleukin-5mepolizumabReslizumab

Identifiers

PMID30661320
PMCPMC6340799
OpenAlexW2908628526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.