ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2020
Development and Testing of a Decision Aid for Unaffected Women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation.
Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Research status and hotspots of oncology genetic nursing: a bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Pilot study of a culturally sensitive intervention to promote genetic counseling for breast cancer risk.BMC health services research · 2022Trial
- Article
- Review
- Consumer-oriented (patient and family) outcomes from nursing in genomics: a scoping review of the literature (2012-2022).Frontiers in genetics · 2024Article
- Article
- Patient decision support resources inform decisions about cancer susceptibility genetic testing and risk management: a systematic review of patient impact and experience.Frontiers in health services · 2023Review
- Perceptions and care Recommendations from Previvors: Qualitative analysis of female BRCA1/2 mutation Carriers' experience with genetic testing and counseling.Gynecologic oncology reports · 2022Article
- Article
- Decision Aids for Preventive Treatment Alternatives forGeburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2021Article
- Systemic Barriers to Risk-Reducing Interventions for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes: Implications for Health Care Inequities.JCO precision oncology · 2021Review
- Genetic testing for hereditary cancer syndromes: patient recommendations for improved risk communication.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For women who are unaffected carriers of a pathogenic BRCA mutation, cancer risk management requires ongoing education, counseling, and support from an interdisciplinary team of medical specialists, genetic counselors, and nurses specializing in genomics. The purpose of this study was to develop and pilot test an educational, patient-focused decision aid to facilitate shared decision making. A steering committee developed the prototype aid after an extensive review of the literature. The aid was designed at the ninth-grade reading level, to be consistent with internationally accepted clinical guidelines and inclusive of all risk management options and psychosocial issues important to cancer risk management decision making. The aid was tested with 23 participants: eight experts and 15 end users. Eleven survey items were asked related to organization, clarity, usefulness, comprehensiveness, ease of understanding, and relevance to the cancer risk management decision-making process. Mean scores were 3 or higher on Likert scales of 1-4 (high) for each of the 11 items. Two open-ended questions elicited general comments and suggestions for additions, deletions, or revisions to the decision aid. The steering committee made final revisions to the aid based on participant feedback and committee consensus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.