Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30661217›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2019

Utilization of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in American hospitalized pregnant women undergoing cesarean section.

Tiffany K Pon, Natalie Wessel, Vincent Cagonot, Ronnie Delmonte, Denise Roach, Laurel Finta

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Tiffany K PonDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco, 2315 Stockton Blvd, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA. tkpon@ucdavis.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6733-3123
Natalie WesselDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dignity Health, 8220 Wymark Dr, Ste 200, Elk Grove, CA, 95757, USA.
Vincent CagonotCalifornia Poison Control System, University of California, Davis Medical Center, 2315 Stockton Blvd, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA.
Ronnie DelmonteDepartment of Pharmacy, University of California, San Diego Health, 200 W Arbor Dr, San Diego, CA, 92103, USA.
Denise RoachDepartment of Pharmacy Services, University of California, Davis Medical Center, 2315 Stockton Blvd, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA.
Laurel FintaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Davis Medical Center, 2315 Stockton Blvd, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA.
University of California Davis Medical Center · USDignity Health · USUniversity of California San Diego · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Pregnancy-related venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading preventable cause of maternal mortality in the United States; however, American guidelines for pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis remain less aggressive than other developed countries. The Safe Motherhood Initiative (SMI) combines aspects of American and international guidelines to increase utilization of prophylaxis and thereby decrease incidence of pregnancy-related VTE. Objectives To evaluate the prescribing and administration rates of pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis for women undergoing cesarean section (c-section) when retrospectively applying the SMI recommendations. Setting Large academic medical center in Sacramento, California, USA. Method This was a single-center retrospective cohort study of pregnant women undergoing c-section who would have met criteria for pharmacologic prophylaxis according to the SMI. Main outcome measures Prescribing and administration rates of mechanical and pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis. Secondary outcomes included incidence of thromboembolism within 6 weeks after c-section and thromboembolic associated mortality. Results A total of 616 charts were analyzed. When applying the SMI guidelines for VTE prophylaxis, the prescribing rates for mechanical and pharmacologic prophylaxis were 94.3% and 4.71% of patients, respectively, and 94.9% of ordered pharmacologic prophylaxis doses were administered. The incidence of 6-week post-partum VTE was 0.49%. There were no cases of VTE-associated mortality. Conclusion This study demonstrated that a large population of c-section patients fit the SMI criteria for pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis but did not receive it. We observed a 0.49% rate of VTE, which was slightly higher than the nationally reported average rate of 0.3%. With growing rates of pregnancy-associated VTE in the United States, perhaps a more aggressive guideline is warranted.

Indexed as

AdultAnticoagulantsCesarean SectionFemaleHumansPostoperative ComplicationsPre-Exposure ProphylaxisPregnancyRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesVenous ThromboembolismAnticoagulantsCesarean sectionMaternal morbidityObstetric thromboembolismUnited StatesVenous thromboembolismVenous thromboembolism prophylaxis

Identifiers

PMID30661217
OpenAlexW2908668242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.