Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30661209›Full record

Observational studyObesity surgery2019

Timing of Gestation After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG): Does It Influence Obstetrical and Neonatal Outcomes of Pregnancies?

Seda Sancak, Özgen Çeler, Elif Çırak, Aziz Bora Karip, M Tumiçin Aydın, Nuriye Esen Bulut, M Mahir Fersahoğlu, Hasan Altun, Kemal Memişoğlu

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Obesity surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Seda SancakFatih Sultan Mehmet Education and Research Hospital, Endocrinology and Metabolism Disorders, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Atasehir, 34752, İstanbul, Turkey. drsedasancak@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-0072-5901
Özgen ÇelerFatih Sultan Mehmet Education and Research Hospital, Endocrinology and Metabolism Disorders, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Atasehir, 34752, İstanbul, Turkey.
Elif ÇırakFatih Sultan Mehmet Education and Research Hospital, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Atasehir, İstanbul, Turkey.
Aziz Bora KaripGeneral Surgery Clinic, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Education and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Atasehir, Istanbul, Turkey.
M Tumiçin AydınGeneral Surgery Clinic, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Education and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Atasehir, Istanbul, Turkey.
Nuriye Esen BulutGeneral Surgery Clinic, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Education and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Atasehir, Istanbul, Turkey.
M Mahir FersahoğluGeneral Surgery Clinic, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Education and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Atasehir, Istanbul, Turkey.
Hasan AltunGeneral Surgery Clinic, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Education and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Atasehir, Istanbul, Turkey.
Kemal MemişoğluGeneral Surgery Clinic, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Education and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Atasehir, Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimWe aimed to evaluate the effect of pregnancy timing after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) on maternal and fetal outcomes.

methodsWomen with LSG were stratified into two groups with surgery-to-conception intervals of ≤ 18 months (early group) or > 18 months (late group). Only the first delivery after LSG was included in this study. We compared maternal characteristics, pregnancy, and neonatal outcomes and adherence to the Institute of Medicine's (IOM) recommendations for gestational weight gain (GWG) in the two groups.

resultsFifteen patients conceived ≤ 18 months after surgery, with a mean surgery-to-conception interval of 5.6 ± 4.12 months, and 29 women conceived > 18 months following LSG, with a mean surgery-to-conception interval of 32.31 ± 11.38 months, p < 0.05. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding birth weight, gestational age, cesarean deliveries (CD), preterm birth, whether their child was small or large for their gestational age, or in the need of neonatal intensive care. There was no correlation between mean weight loss from operation till conception, mean weight gain during pregnancy, and mean body mass index (BMI) at conception between birth weight in either study group. Inadequate and normal GWG was significantly higher in the early group, whereas excessive GWG was significantly higher in the late group (X

conclusionThe interval between LSG and conception did not impact maternal and neonatal outcomes. Pregnancy after LSG was overall safe and well-tolerated.

Indexed as

Pregnancy OutcomeAdultBariatric SurgeryBirth WeightBody Mass IndexFemaleGastrectomyGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornLaparoscopyObesity, MorbidPostoperative PeriodPreconception CarePregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsIOMLaparoscopic sleeve gastrectomyMaternal outcomesPerinatalSurgery-to-conception time interval

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.