Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30661159›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of epidemiology2019

Intake of sucrose-sweetened soft beverages during pregnancy and risk of congenital heart defects (CHD) in offspring: a Norwegian pregnancy cohort study.

Maria T Grønning Dale, Per Magnus, Elisabeth Leirgul, Henrik Holmstrøm, Håkon K Gjessing, Kristoffer Brodwall, Margaretha Haugen, Camilla Stoltenberg, Nina Øyen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of epidemiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Maria T Grønning DaleDepartment of Child Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Post Box 4404, 0403, Nydalen, Oslo, Norway. MariaTeresaGronning.Dale@fhi.no.
Per MagnusCentre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Elisabeth LeirgulDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Henrik HolmstrømDivision of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Håkon K GjessingCentre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Kristoffer BrodwallDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Margaretha HaugenNorwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Camilla StoltenbergDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Nina ØyenDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

Funding

Oak Fundation Unrestricted grantResearch Council of Norway 190858/V50Research Council of Norway, Centers of Excellence funding scheme 262700Western Norway Regional Health Authorities 911734
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies report increased risk of congenital heart defects (CHD) in the offspring of mothers with diabetes, where high blood glucose levels might confer the risk. We explored the association between intake of sucrose-sweetened soft beverages during pregnancy and risk of CHD. Prospective cohort data with 88,514 pregnant women participating in the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study was linked with information on infant CHD diagnoses from national health registers and the Cardiovascular Diseases in Norway Project. Risk ratios were estimated by fitting generalized linear models and generalized additive models. The prevalence of children with CHD was 12/1000 in this cohort (1049/88,514). Among these, 201 had severe and 848 had non-severe CHD (patent ductus arteriosus; valvular pulmonary stenosis; ventricular septal defect; atrial septal defect). Only non-severe CHD was associated with sucrose-sweetened soft beverages. The adjusted risk ratios (aRR) for non-severe CHD was 1.30 (95% CI 1.07-1.58) for women who consumed 25-70 ml/day and 1.27 (95% CI 1.06-1.52) for women who consumed ≥ 70 ml/day when compared to those drinking ≤ 25 ml/day. Dose-response analyses revealed an association between the risk of non-severe CHD and the increasing exposure to sucrose-sweetened soft beverages, especially for septal defects with aRR = 1.26 (95% CI 1.07-1.47) per tenfold increase in daily intake dose. The findings persisted after adjustment for maternal diabetes or after excluding mothers with diabetes (n = 19). Fruit juices, cordial beverages and artificial sweeteners showed no associations with CHD. The findings suggest that sucrose-sweetened soft beverages may affect the CHD risk in offspring.

Indexed as

Prenatal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAdultBeveragesCohort StudiesFemaleHeart Defects, CongenitalHumansInfantMaleNorwayPregnancyRisk FactorsSucroseSucroseCohort studyCongenital heart defectPregnancySugar consumption

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.