Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30661156›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational rehabilitation2019

Adaptation of a Guide to Equip Employers to Manage the Gradual Return to Work of Individuals with a Musculoskeletal Disorder.

Julie Bouffard, Marie-José Durand, Marie-France Coutu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Current Practice of Gradual Return to Work in Germany: A Qualitative Study Protocol.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julie BouffardCentre for Action in Work Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, 150 Place Charles LeMoyne, Suite 200, Longueuil, QC, J4K 0A8, Canada. Julie.Bouffard2@usherbrooke.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-1419-5411
Marie-José DurandCentre for Action in Work Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, 150 Place Charles LeMoyne, Suite 200, Longueuil, QC, J4K 0A8, Canada.
Marie-France CoutuCentre for Action in Work Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, 150 Place Charles LeMoyne, Suite 200, Longueuil, QC, J4K 0A8, Canada.
Université de Sherbrooke · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose The gradual return to work (GRTW) of injured workers poses numerous challenges for workplaces. The aim of this study was to provide employers with an adapted tool to support them in managing GRTWs following a musculoskeletal disorder (MSD), by adapting the Guide for estimation of margin of manoeuvre (Durand et al. in 7th international scientific conference on prevention of work-related musculoskeletal disorders, 2010) and then evaluating the acceptability of the adapted version. Methods A mixed methods design was used. Content experts were surveyed about the content and form of a first version of the adapted tool. Proposed modifications were then discussed in a group meeting until consensus was reached on the changes to be made. The acceptability of the new version was determined by conducting semi-structured interviews of potential users. A thematic analysis of the verbatim transcript was performed. Results Nine experts reached a consensus on 20 modifications, which yielded a tool comprising an instruction guide and a planning worksheet. The eight companies consulted found the tool acceptable, useful, and pertinent, but also identified a few changes to be made. Conclusion The use of original methods made it possible to adapt the content of the tool while taking evidence-based data and user needs into account, all of which contributed to its acceptance. The tool will support employers and standardize management of GRTWs following MSD-related sick leaves. Possible avenues for future research emerged from this study: evaluate the acceptability of new formats and a transdiagnostic version of the tool, and consult workers.

Indexed as

Personnel ManagementReturn to WorkAdultFemaleHumansMaleMusculoskeletal DiseasesWork Capacity EvaluationGuidelineKnowledge transferMusculoskeletal diseasesReturn-to-workWorkplace

Identifiers

PMID30661156
OpenAlexW2910493218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.