Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30660818›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the American College of Surgeons2019

Enhancing Patient Outcomes while Containing Costs after Complex Abdominal Operation: A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Whipple Accelerated Recovery Pathway.

Harish Lavu, Neal S McCall, Jordan M Winter, Richard A Burkhart, Michael Pucci, Benjamin E Leiby, Theresa P Yeo, Shawnna Cannaday, Charles J Yeo

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02517268 (A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating an Accelerated 5 Day Pathway for Discharge Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02517268 nacompletednot on this map

A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating an Accelerated 5 Day Pathway for Discharge Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD): Whipple Accelerated Recovery Pathway (WARP Trial)

TypeinterventionalSponsorSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson UniversityRan2015 to 2019Enrolled98ConditionsPancreatic CarcinomaArmsPancreaticoduodenectomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Postoperative nutritional support after pancreaticoduodenectomy in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. The Financial Implications of Pancreatic Surgery: The Hospital Is the Big Winner, Not the Surgeon!Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Associations Between Patient Characteristics and Whipple Procedure Outcomes Before and After Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Early Postoperative Vital Signs Predict Subsequent 90-Day Mortality After Pancreaticoduodenectomy.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Iterative Changes in Risk-Stratified Pancreatectomy Clinical Pathways and Accelerated Discharge After Pancreaticoduodenectomy.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Harish LavuDepartment of Surgery and the Jefferson Pancreas, Biliary and Related Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA. Electronic address: Harish.lavu@jefferson.edu.
Neal S McCallDepartment of Surgery and the Jefferson Pancreas, Biliary and Related Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
Jordan M WinterDepartment of Surgery and the Jefferson Pancreas, Biliary and Related Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
Richard A BurkhartDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD.
Michael PucciDepartment of Surgery and the Jefferson Pancreas, Biliary and Related Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
Benjamin E LeibyDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
Theresa P YeoDepartment of Surgery and the Jefferson Pancreas, Biliary and Related Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
Shawnna CannadayDepartment of Surgery and the Jefferson Pancreas, Biliary and Related Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
Charles J YeoDepartment of Surgery and the Jefferson Pancreas, Biliary and Related Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.

Funding

X-Ray Crystallography and Macromolecular CharacterizationP30CA056036 · NCI · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI Andrew Chapman · 1995 to 2026
$94.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA056036
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study was designed to determine whether a standardized recovery pathway could reduce post-pancreaticoduodenectomy hospital length of stay to 5 days without increasing complication or readmission rates. STUDY

designPancreaticoduodenectomy patients (high-risk patients excluded) were enrolled in an IRB-approved, prospective, randomized controlled trial (NCT02517268) comparing a 5-day Whipple accelerated recovery pathway (WARP) with our traditional 7-day pathway (control). Whipple accelerated recovery pathway interventions included early discharge planning, shortened ICU stay, modified postoperative dietary and drain management algorithm, rigorous physical therapy with in-hospital gym visit, standardized rectal suppository administration, and close telehealth follow-up post discharge. The trial was powered to detect an increase in postoperative day 5 discharge from 10% to 30% (80% power, α = 0.05, 2-sided Fisher's exact test, target accrual: 142 patients).

resultsSeventy-six patients (37 WARP, 39 control) were randomized from June 2015 to September 2017. A planned interim analysis was conducted at 50% trial accrual resulting in mandatory early stoppage, as the predefined efficacy end point was met. Demographic variables between groups were similar. The WARP significantly increased the number of patients discharged to home by postoperative day 5 compared with controls (75.7% vs 12.8%; p < 0.001) without increasing readmission rates (8.1% vs 10.3%; p = 1.0). Overall complication rates did not differ between groups (29.7% vs 43.6%; p = 0.24), but the WARP significantly reduced the time from operation to adjuvant therapy initiation (51 days vs 66 days; p = 0.005) and hospital cost ($26,563 vs $31,845; p = 0.011).

conclusionsThe WARP can safely reduce hospital length of stay, time to adjuvant therapy, and cost in selected pancreaticoduodenectomy patients without increasing readmission risk.

Indexed as

Enhanced Recovery After SurgeryPancreaticoduodenectomyAbdomenAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCost SavingsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHospital CostsHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPatient ReadmissionPhiladelphia

Identifiers

PMID30660818
PMCPMC8158656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.