Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30660183›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2019

Screening for depression in women during pregnancy or the first year postpartum and in the general adult population: a protocol for two systematic reviews to update a guideline of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.

Candyce Hamel, Eddy Lang, Kate Morissette, Andrew Beck, Adrienne Stevens, Becky Skidmore, Heather Colquhoun, John LeBlanc, Ainsley Moore, John J Riva and 16 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Recommendation on screening adults for depression using a screening tool.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025
    Guideline
  2. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Recommendation on instrument-based screening for depression during pregnancy and the postpartum period.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Perinatal mental health: a review of progress and challenges.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2020
    Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Candyce HamelKnowledge Synthesis Group, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. cahamel@ohri.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-5871-2137
Eddy LangUniversity of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Kate MorissettePublic Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Andrew BeckKnowledge Synthesis Group, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Adrienne StevensKnowledge Synthesis Group, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Becky SkidmoreKnowledge Synthesis Group, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Heather ColquhounDepartment of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
John LeBlancDepartment of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Ainsley MooreDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
John J RivaDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Brett D ThombsLady Davis Institute of the Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Ian ColmanSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Sophie GrigoriadisDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Stuart Gordon NichollsOttawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Beth K PotterSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Kerri RitchieOttawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Julie RobertPatient representative, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Priya VasaDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Bianca Lauria-HornerDepartment of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Scott PattenDepartment of Community Health Services and Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Simone N VigodDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Brian HuttonKnowledge Synthesis Group, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Beverley J SheaKnowledge Synthesis Group, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Shamila ShanmugasegaramPublic Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Julian LittleSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
David MoherKnowledge Synthesis Group, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
University of Ottawa · CAOttawa Hospital · CAAlberta Health Services · CADalhousie University · CAHealth Sciences Centre · CAPublic Health Agency of Canada · CAUniversity of Toronto · CAJewish General Hospital · CASt. Michael's Hospital · CASunnybrook Health Science Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2018, the World Health Organization reported that depression is the most common cause of disability worldwide, with over 300 million people currently living with depression. Depression affects an individual's physical health and well-being, impacts psychosocial functioning, and has specific negative short- and long-term effects on maternal health, child health, developmental trajectories, and family health. The aim of these reviews is to identify evidence on the benefits and harms of screening for depression in the general adult population and in pregnant and postpartum women.

methodsSearch strategies were developed and tested through an iterative process by an experienced medical information specialist in consultation with the review team. We will search MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library, and a randomized controlled trial filter will be used. The general adult review will be an update of a systematic review previously used by the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care for their 2013 guideline recommendation. The search strategy will be updated and will start from the last search date of the previous review (May 2012). The pregnant and postpartum review will be a de novo review with no date restriction. For both reviews, we will search for unpublished documents following the CADTH Grey Matters checklist and relevant websites. Titles and abstracts will be screened using the liberal accelerated method. Two reviewers will independently screen full-text articles for relevance using pre-specified eligibility criteria and assess the risk of bias of included studies using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Outcomes of interest for the general adult population review include symptoms of depression or diagnosis of major depressive disorder, health-related quality of life, day-to-day functionality, lost time at work/school, impact on lifestyle behaviour, suicidality, false-positive result, labelling/stigma, overdiagnosis or overtreatment, and harms of treatment. Outcomes of interest for the pregnant and postpartum review include mental health outcomes (e.g. diagnosis of major depressive disorder), parenting outcomes (e.g. mother-child interactions), and infant outcomes (e.g. infant health and development). DISCUSSION: These two systematic reviews will offer informative evaluations of depression screening. The findings will be used by the Task Force to help develop guideline recommendations on depression screening in the general adult population and in pregnant and postpartum women in Canada. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42018099690).

Indexed as

Prenatal DiagnosisSystematic Reviews as TopicDepressionDepression, PostpartumEarly DiagnosisFemaleHumansMajor Depressive DisorderPractice Guidelines as TopicPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsResearch DesignAdultsDepressionPostpartumPregnancyScreeningSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID30660183
PMCPMC6339426
OpenAlexW2910872315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.