Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30659473›Full record

ArticleLasers in medical science2019

In vivo detection of oral precancer using a fluorescence-based, in-house-fabricated device: a Mahalanobis distance-based classification.

Pavan Kumar, Surendra Kumar Kanaujia, Ashutosh Singh, Asima Pradhan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Lasers in medical science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pavan KumarDepartment of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur (IITK), Kanpur, 208016, India.
Surendra Kumar KanaujiaDepartment of ENT, Ganesh Shankar Vidyarthi Memorial College (GSVM), Kanpur, 208002, India.
Ashutosh SinghDepartment of ENT, Ganesh Shankar Vidyarthi Memorial College (GSVM), Kanpur, 208002, India.
Asima PradhanDepartment of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur (IITK), Kanpur, 208016, India. asima@iitk.ac.in.
Ganesh Shankar Vidyarthi Memorial Medical College · INIndian Institute of Technology Kanpur · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In vivo detection of oral precancer has been carried out by a fluorescence-based, in-house-developed handheld probe on three groups: oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), dysplastic (precancer), and control (normal). Measurements have been performed on a total of 141 patients and volunteers of different age groups. Excitation wavelength of 405 nm was used and fluorescence emission spectra were recorded in the scan range of 450.14 to 763.41 nm at very low incident power (122 μW) from different oral sites buccal mucosa (BM), lateral boarder of tongue (LBT), and dorsal surface of tongue (DST). Spectral profiles are found to vary among the three groups as well as among the different oral sites. Major and minor bands of flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD) and porphyrins near 500, 634, 676, 689, and 703 nm have been obtained. Porphyrin contribution is found to be more dominant than the FAD in OSCC and dysplastic groups as compared to the control group. A better classification has been observed using the entire spectral range rather than restricting to individual bands, by application of principal component analysis (PCA), Mahalanobis distance model, and receiver operating characteristic analysis (ROC). ROC on Mahalanobis distance differentiates OSCC to normal, dysplastic to normal, and OSCC to dysplastic with sensitivities from 71% to 98%, 92% to 94% and 81% to 93% and specificities 91% to 100%, 86% to 100% and 79% to 97% for oral sites BM, LBT and DST. LBT and DST appear to be more sensitive to dysplasia detection as compared to BM.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCarcinoma, Squamous CellCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMouth MucosaMouth NeoplasmsPrecancerous ConditionsPredictive Value of TestsPrincipal Component AnalysisSpectrometry, FluorescenceTongueYoung AdultFluorescence spectroscopyMahalanobis distance modelOral cancerOral sitesPrinciple component analysisReceiver operating characteristic analysis

Identifiers

PMID30659473
OpenAlexW2911015885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.