Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30659405›Full record

ArticleThe journal of primary prevention2019

Reconciling Adaptation and Fidelity: Implications for Scaling Up High Quality Youth Programs.

Yolanda Anyon, Joe Roscoe, Kimberly Bender, Heather Kennedy, Jonah Dechants, Stephanie Begun, Christine Gallager

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of primary prevention, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yolanda AnyonGraduate School of Social Work, University of Denver, 2148 S. High Street, Denver, CO, 80208, USA. yanyon@du.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5707-8568
Joe RoscoeSchool of Social Work, University of California Berkeley, 120 Haviland Hall, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.
Kimberly BenderGraduate School of Social Work, University of Denver, 2148 S. High Street, Denver, CO, 80208, USA.
Heather KennedyGraduate School of Social Work, University of Denver, 2148 S. High Street, Denver, CO, 80208, USA.
Jonah DechantsGraduate School of Social Work, University of Denver, 2148 S. High Street, Denver, CO, 80208, USA.
Stephanie BegunFactor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, 246 Bloor Street West, Toronto, ON, M5S 1V4, Canada.
Christine GallagerGraduate School of Social Work, University of Denver, 2148 S. High Street, Denver, CO, 80208, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the field of prevention science, some consider fidelity to manualized protocols to be a hallmark of successful implementation. A growing number of scholars agree that high-quality implementation should also include some adaptations to local context, particularly as prevention programs are scaled up, in order to strengthen their relevance and increase participant engagement. From this perspective, fidelity and adaptation can both be seen as necessary, albeit mutually exclusive, dimensions of implementation quality. In this article, we propose that the relationship between these two constructs may be more complex, particularly when adaptations are consistent with the key principles underlying the program model. Our argument draws on examples from the implementation of a manualized youth voice program (YVP) in two different organizations serving six distinct communities. Through a series of retreats, implementers identified examples of modifications made and grouped them into themes. Results suggest that some adaptations were actually indicators of fidelity to the key principles of YVPs: power-sharing, youth ownership, and engagement in social change. We therefore offer suggestions for re-conceptualizing the fidelity-adaptation debate, highlight implications for measurement and assessment, and illustrate that the de facto treatment of adaptation and fidelity as opposing constructs may limit the diffusion or scaling up of these types of youth programs.

Indexed as

Adolescent DevelopmentCommunicationHealth Services ResearchImplementation ScienceLeadershipAdolescentColoradoFemaleHumansMalePreventive Health ServicesProgram DevelopmentProgram EvaluationSocial ChangeAdaptationFidelityImplementationMeasurementPreventionScaleYouth programs

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.