Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30659355›Full record

SynthesisJournal of neurology2020

Deep brain stimulation for monogenic Parkinson's disease: a systematic review.

Tomi Kuusimäki, Jaana Korpela, Eero Pekkonen, Mika H Martikainen, Angelo Antonini, Valtteri Kaasinen

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Early Levodopa-Induced Motor Complications in RAB39B X-Linked Parkinsonism.Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.) · 2024
    Article
  14. Long-Read Sequencing Resolves a Complex Structural Variant in PRKN Parkinson's Disease.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2023
    Article
  15. A case of childhood-onset dystonia-parkinsonism due to homozygous parkin mutations and effect of globus pallidus deep brain stimulation.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. How Does Deep Brain Stimulation Change the Course of Parkinson's Disease?Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tomi KuusimäkiDivision of Clinical Neurosciences, Turku University Hospital, Hämeentie 11, POB 52, 20521, Turku, Finland. tomi.kuusimaki@utu.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4829-7275
Jaana KorpelaDivision of Clinical Neurosciences, Turku University Hospital, Hämeentie 11, POB 52, 20521, Turku, Finland.
Eero PekkonenDepartment of Neurology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Mika H MartikainenDivision of Clinical Neurosciences, Turku University Hospital, Hämeentie 11, POB 52, 20521, Turku, Finland.
Angelo AntoniniDepartment of Neurosciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Valtteri KaasinenDivision of Clinical Neurosciences, Turku University Hospital, Hämeentie 11, POB 52, 20521, Turku, Finland.
University of Turku · FIUniversity of Helsinki · FIUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD) patients with motor fluctuations and dyskinesias. The key DBS efficacy studies were performed in PD patients with unknown genotypes; however, given the estimated monogenic mutation prevalence of approximately 5-10%, most commonly LRRK2, PRKN, PINK1 and SNCA, and risk-increasing genetic factors such as GBA, proper characterization is becoming increasingly relevant. We performed a systematic review of 46 studies that reported DBS effects in 221 genetic PD patients. The results suggest that monogenic PD patients have variable DBS benefit depending on the mutated gene. Outcome appears excellent in patients with the most common LRRK2 mutation, p.G2019S, and good in patients with PRKN mutations but poor in patients with the more rare LRRK2 p.R1441G mutation. The overall benefit of DBS in SNCA, GBA and LRRK2 p.T2031S mutations may be compromised due to rapid progression of cognitive and neuropsychiatric symptoms. In the presence of other mutations, the motor changes in DBS-treated monogenic PD patients appear comparable to those of the general PD population.

Indexed as

Deep Brain StimulationOutcome Assessment, Health CareHumansParkinson DiseaseDeep brain stimulationGeneticMonogenicParkinson’s disease

Identifiers

PMID30659355
PMCPMC7109183
OpenAlexW2909306295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.