Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30659311›Full record

ReviewIntensive care medicine2019

Rationalizing antimicrobial therapy in the ICU: a narrative review.

Jean-François Timsit, Matteo Bassetti, Olaf Cremer, George Daikos, Jan de Waele, Andre Kallil, Eric Kipnis, Marin Kollef, Kevin Laupland, Jose-Artur Paiva and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Intensive care medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 121 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
121citing papers in PubMed
25.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

121 citing papers in PubMed, 257 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Hour-1 Sepsis Bundle: Updated Evidence.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Comorbidities and mortality in colistin-resistant gram-negative infections among hospitalized patients in Qassim, Saudi Arabia.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Current standard of care for septic shock.Intensive care medicine · 2026
    Review
  19. Introduction to XIV updating course of antimicrobials and infectious diseases.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2025
    Review
  20. Therapeutic approach in the critically ill patient with suspected multidrug resistance.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2025
    Review

61 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 15 institutions in 10 countries.

Jean-François TimsitMedical and Infectious Diseases ICU, APHP, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, 46 Rue Henri-Huchard, 75877, Paris Cedex 18, France. jean-francois.timsit@aphp.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-6063-7383
Matteo BassettiInfectious Diseases Division, Department of Medicine, University of Udine and Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Udine, Udine, Italy.
Olaf CremerDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
George DaikosScool of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Jan de WaeleDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Andre KallilDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Eric KipnisSurgical Critical Care Unit, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Perioperative Medicine, CHU Lille, Lille, France.
Marin KollefCritical Care Research, Washington University School of Medicine and Respiratory Care Services, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Kevin LauplandDepartment of Medicine, Royal Inland Hospital, Kamloops, Canada.
Jose-Artur PaivaIntensive Care Medicine Department, Centro Hospitalar São João and Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Jesús Rodríguez-BañoClinical Unit of Infectious Diseases, Microbiology and Preventive Medicine, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Departament of Medicine, University of Sevilla, Biomedicine Institute of Seville (IBiS), Seville, Spain.
Étienne RuppéINSERM, IAME, UMR 1137, Paris-Diderot Sorbonne-Paris Cité University, Paris, France.
Jorge SalluhDepartment of Critical Care and Graduate Program in Translational Medicine, D'Or Institute for Research and Education, IDOR, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil.
Fabio Silvio TacconeDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasme Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.
Emmanuel WeissDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Beaujon Hospital, AP-HP, Clichy, France.
François BarbierMedical ICU, La Source Hospital, CHR Orléans, Orléans, France.
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRBarnes-Jewish Hospital · USCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille · FRCentre hospitalier universitaire d'Orléans · FRD’Or Institute for Research and Education · BRErasmus Hospital · BEGhent University Hospital · BEHospital Universitario Virgen Macarena · ESInserm · FRNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRRoyal Inland Hospital · CAUniversidade do Porto · PTUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center · USUniversity of Udine · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The massive consumption of antibiotics in the ICU is responsible for substantial ecological side effects that promote the dissemination of multidrug-resistant bacteria (MDRB) in this environment. Strikingly, up to half of ICU patients receiving empirical antibiotic therapy have no definitively confirmed infection, while de-escalation and shortened treatment duration are insufficiently considered in those with documented sepsis, highlighting the potential benefit of implementing antibiotic stewardship programs (ASP) and other quality improvement initiatives. The objective of this narrative review is to summarize the available evidence, emerging options, and unsolved controversies for the optimization of antibiotic therapy in the ICU. Published data notably support the need for better identification of patients at risk of MDRB infection, more accurate diagnostic tools enabling a rule-in/rule-out approach for bacterial sepsis, an individualized reasoning for the selection of single-drug or combination empirical regimen, the use of adequate dosing and administration schemes to ensure the attainment of pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics targets, concomitant source control when appropriate, and a systematic reappraisal of initial therapy in an attempt to minimize collateral damage on commensal ecosystems through de-escalation and treatment-shortening whenever conceivable. This narrative review also aims at compiling arguments for the elaboration of actionable ASP in the ICU, including improved patient outcomes and a reduction in antibiotic-related selection pressure that may help to control the dissemination of MDRB in this healthcare setting.

Indexed as

RationalizationAnti-Infective AgentsAntimicrobial StewardshipHumansIntensive Care UnitsMedical OveruseRisk FactorsAnti-Infective AgentsAntibiotic stewardshipAntimicrobial resistanceCarbapenemCritical illnessEmpirical therapyOutcomeSepsis

Identifiers

PMID30659311
OpenAlexW2911007809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.