Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30659298›Full record

ReviewNature chemical biology2019

Molecular tools for imaging and recording neuronal activity.

Wenjing Wang, Christina K Kim, Alice Y Ting

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature chemical biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Distinct subpopulations of parvalbumin neurons participating in divergent prefrontal functions.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Fiber-basedNeurophotonics · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Beyond a Transmission Cable-New Technologies to Reveal the Richness in Axonal Electrophysiology.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  9. Molecular tools to capture active neural circuits.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. An open-source transparent microelectrode array.Journal of neural engineering · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wenjing WangDepartments of Genetics, Biology, and Chemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6025-9848
Christina K KimDepartments of Genetics, Biology, and Chemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Alice Y TingDepartments of Genetics, Biology, and Chemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. ayting@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8277-5226

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To understand how the brain relates to behavior, it is essential to record neural activity in awake, behaving animals. To achieve this goal, a large variety of genetically encoded sensors have been developed to monitor and record the series of events following neuronal firing, including action potentials, intracellular calcium rise, neurotransmitter release and immediate early gene expression. In this Review, we discuss the existing genetically encoded tools for detecting and integrating neuronal activity in animals and highlight the remaining challenges and future opportunities for molecular biologists.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainBrain MappingHumansMolecular ImagingNeurons

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.